Solid State Energy Applications: From Micro-Power to Infrastructure

Power Scaling: IoT Sensors vs. Critical Infrastructure

This page describes target applications for VENDOR solid-state energy generation technology. These scenarios represent our strategic roadmap based on technical analysis, industry research, and validated physics principles. Current Status: VENDOR is at TRL 5-6 (laboratory validation complete, 1000+ hours operational data). Pilot deployments are planned for 2026-2027, with commercial availability targeting 2027-2028. The applications below show where VENDOR technology will create value when field validation is complete.

How to Read This Page: Deep-Tech Application Logic

VENDOR is not a software product where applications launch immediately. Deep-tech energy systems follow a sequential path: 1. TRL (Technology Readiness Level) → Does the physics work under controlled conditions? 2. Field Pilots → Does it work in the real world (TRL 7)? 3. Certification (CE/UL) → Can it be deployed commercially? 4. Market Applications → Only after validation and certification. This page therefore describes target applications based on:

validated physics (TRL 5–6),
modeled economics,
market pain points,
engineering analysis.

These are not commercially available deployments yet. Each application activates only as the technology progresses through TRL 6 → TRL 7 → TRL 8–9.

VENDOR technology targets two distinct power domains:

VENDOR.Zero: Battery-Free Micro-Power Applications (3.3–12V DC)

Target Market: IoT sensors, edge devices, building automation, safety systems Technical Approach:

Solid-state DC generation (3.3V, 5V, 12V outputs)
No batteries, no external fuel or grid supply, no consumables
Designed for 15–20 year operational lifespan (design target based on solid-state architecture analysis, pending field validation)
Target: Replace battery-powered sensor infrastructure

Development Status:

Architecture validated in laboratory conditions
Prototype specifications defined
Pilot program design underway
Target TRL 7: 2026–2027

Primary Applications:

Smart buildings (HVAC, CO₂, leak detection)
Security systems (locks, cameras, motion sensors)
Industrial monitoring (pressure, vibration, temperature)
Environmental sensing (air quality, water, perimeter)
Agriculture IoT (soil, irrigation, weather stations)

VENDOR.Max: Autonomous Power Nodes (2.4–24 kW)

Target Market: Off-grid facilities, telecom infrastructure, emergency response, critical systems Technical Approach:

Modular solid-state generation (2.4, 6, 12, 18, 24 kW configurations)
Scalable architecture (parallel clusters to 100+ kW)
No fuel, no batteries, no grid connection required
Designed for remote and harsh environments

Development Status:

Core physics validated (1000+ laboratory hours)
TRL 5–6 trajectory (laboratory rebuild → validation phase)
Pilot discussions with telecom, defense, and emergency response operators
Target TRL 7: 2027

Primary Applications:

Off-grid housing (cabins, remote facilities, research stations)
Telecom infrastructure (remote towers, edge computing, backup power)
Infrastructure nodes (roads, tunnels, water systems, public facilities)
Mobility support (small charging, depots, autonomous equipment)
Emergency response (disaster relief, field hospitals, command centers)

Two Product Lines

From micro-power sensors to kilowatt infrastructure — one architecture, two scales

Micro

Macro

VENDOR.Zero

Micro-Power

Power Output

3.3–12V DC

Solid-state DC generation

Target Market

IoT sensors & edge devices
Building automation
Security systems
Environmental sensing
Agriculture IoT

Current: TRL 5–6 (Lab validated)

Target: TRL 7 (field pilots phase)

VENDOR.Max

Power Nodes

Power Output

2.4–24 kW

Modular, scalable to 100+ kW

Target Market

Off-grid housing & facilities
Telecom infrastructure
Infrastructure nodes
Mobility support
Emergency response

Current: TRL 5–6 (Lab validated)

Target: TRL 7 (post-field validation)

Top 10 Use Cases for Solid State Generators

VENDOR.Zero Applications (Micro-Power)

Smart Buildings: Eliminating Battery Maintenance in HVAC & Safety

Industry Challenge: Commercial buildings deploy thousands of sensors (HVAC, CO₂, occupancy, leak detection) that require battery replacement every 2–5 years. For a typical large facility:

500–2,000 sensors deployed
Replacement cost: €50–150 per sensor (battery + labor)
Annual cost: €25K–300K (depending on scale)
Maintenance complexity: Reactive failures, unpredictable scheduling

Global commercial real estate sensor market: €3.2B annually, with 40% of costs attributed to battery replacement and maintenance (Source: Smart Building Research 2024). Why Current Solutions Fail:

Battery Lifespan: 2–5 years in practice, often shorter in harsh environments
Sleep Cycles: Sensors must sleep to conserve power, creating data gaps
Maintenance Burden: Thousands of service calls annually for large portfolios
Environmental Waste: Millions of batteries disposed yearly

VENDOR.Zero Technical Approach: Solid-state DC generation (3.3–12V) integrated with sensor modules. No electrochemical storage, no degradation, no replacement cycle. Architecture designed for 15–20 year continuous operation. Target Use Cases:

HVAC optimization sensors
CO₂ and air quality monitoring
Water leak detection
Occupancy and lighting control
Building envelope monitoring (temperature, humidity)

Modeled Economics (1,000-sensor building): Baseline (Battery-Powered):

Initial deployment: €100K
Annual replacement (40% rate): €60K
10-year total: €700K

Target (VENDOR.Zero):

Initial deployment: €150K (VENDOR modules integrated)
Annual maintenance: €5K (remote monitoring)
10-year total: €200K

Projected Savings: €500K over 10 years (71% reduction) Environmental Benefit: 4,000 batteries eliminated Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Financial modeling pending pilot validation. Assumes 15-year sensor lifespan vs 2.5-year battery baseline. Development Status:

TRL 5–6 (laboratory validation)
Pilot partner discussions underway (commercial real estate)
Target: First building deployment Q3 2026

Security & Access Systems — Always-On, Maintenance-Free

Industry Challenge: Security systems (locks, cameras, motion sensors, access control) face critical reliability requirements. Battery-powered systems create vulnerabilities:

Unpredictable failures (sensor dies, security compromised)
False alarms from low battery warnings
Maintenance burden (technician visits for battery swaps)
Liability concerns (security breach due to dead battery)

Global commercial security sensor market: €8B annually, with battery replacement representing 15–20% of lifecycle costs. Why Current Solutions Fail:

Reliability Risk: Battery depletion = security vulnerability
Maintenance Cost: €100–200 per sensor replacement (battery + labor)
False Alerts: Low-battery warnings create operational noise
Weather Dependency: Outdoor cameras/sensors degrade faster

VENDOR.Zero Technical Approach: Integrated power modules (5–12V DC) for security devices. No battery anxiety, continuous operation, years between service. Target: Critical security infrastructure with zero maintenance windows. Target Use Cases:

Smart locks (commercial, residential)
Outdoor security cameras
Motion detection perimeters
Access control nodes
Intrusion detection systems

Modeled Economics (100-device security system): Baseline:

Devices + batteries: €20K
Annual replacement (25% rate): €5K
10-year total: €70K

Target (VENDOR.Zero):

Devices + VENDOR modules: €30K
Annual maintenance: €500
10-year total: €35K

Projected Savings: €35K (50% reduction) Reliability Benefit: Zero security downtime from power failures Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Modeled assuming 15-year device lifespan vs 4-year battery replacement cycle. Development Status:

Architecture validated in lab
Pilot discussions with security system integrators
Target: Field trial Q2 2026

Industrial IoT: Powering Sensors in Harsh Environments

Industry Challenge: Industrial facilities deploy sensors in harsh conditions: high temperature, vibration, humidity, chemical exposure. Battery-powered sensors fail prematurely:

Average lifespan: 1–3 years (vs 3–5 in benign environments)
Replacement cost: €150–300 per sensor (difficult access, hazardous areas)
Data gaps: Sensors sleep to conserve power, miss critical events
Safety risk: Undetected leaks, pressure failures, equipment malfunction

Industrial sensor market: €12B annually, with 25–30% of operational costs attributed to sensor replacement and maintenance in harsh environments. Why Current Solutions Fail:

Environmental Degradation: Heat, vibration, chemicals degrade batteries faster
Access Difficulty: Sensors in hard-to-reach locations (high structures, confined spaces)
Sleep Cycles: Cannot support always-on edge AI or real-time alerts
Regulatory Burden: Frequent maintenance in hazardous areas requires safety protocols

VENDOR.Zero Technical Approach: Solid-state modules designed for industrial conditions. No electrochemical components to degrade. Target: Continuous sensing in 50°C, high-vibration, chemically exposed environments. Target Use Cases:

Pressure monitoring (pipelines, vessels, hydraulics)
Vibration analysis (rotating equipment, structural health)
Temperature sensing (furnaces, reactors, thermal processes)
Leak detection (chemical, gas, fluid)
Asset tracking (location, condition, utilization)

Modeled Economics (500-sensor industrial facility): Baseline:

Deployment: €150K
Annual replacement (50% harsh environment rate): €75K
10-year total: €900K

Target (VENDOR.Zero):

Deployment: €225K
Annual maintenance: €10K
10-year total: €325K

Projected Savings: €575K (64% reduction) Safety Benefit: Always-on monitoring reduces undetected failure risk Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Assumes harsh environment conditions accelerate battery degradation to 2-year avg lifespan vs 15-year VENDOR target. Development Status:

Lab testing at elevated temperature/vibration
Industrial pilot partner identification underway
Target: First industrial deployment Q4 2026

Agriculture IoT — Remote Farms, Years Between Service

Industry Challenge: Precision agriculture requires distributed sensors across large areas: soil moisture, weather stations, irrigation control, livestock monitoring. Rural/remote deployments create maintenance challenges:

Access difficulty (dirt roads, seasonal flooding)
Battery replacement cost: €200–400 per sensor (travel + labor)
Unreliable connectivity (cellular/LoRa coverage gaps)
Weather damage (extreme heat, cold, moisture)

Global agricultural IoT market: €5B annually, with battery replacement representing 30–40% of lifecycle costs in remote deployments. Why Current Solutions Fail:

Remote Access: Travel costs exceed sensor value
Weather Degradation: Outdoor conditions shorten battery life
Seasonal Constraints: Limited service windows (harvest, winter)
Connectivity: Sleep cycles miss critical events (frost, irrigation failure)

VENDOR.Zero Technical Approach: Weather-resistant solid-state modules (5–12V) for outdoor sensors. Designed for years of autonomous operation. Target: Install-and-forget agricultural infrastructure. Target Use Cases:

Soil moisture monitoring
Weather stations (wind, rain, temperature)
Irrigation control valves
Livestock tracking and health monitoring
Environmental stations (remote fields, orchards, vineyards)

Modeled Economics (100-sensor farm deployment): Baseline:

Deployment: €30K
Annual replacement (40% harsh weather rate): €16K
10-year total: €190K

Target (VENDOR.Zero):

Deployment: €45K
Annual maintenance: €2K
10-year total: €65K

Projected Savings: €125K (66% reduction) Operational Benefit: Seasonal maintenance windows eliminated Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Assumes outdoor conditions reduce battery life to 2.5-year average vs 15-year VENDOR target. Development Status:

Environmental testing (temperature, humidity, UV exposure)
Pilot discussions with precision agriculture providers
Target: Farm deployment Q2 2027

Environmental & Safety — Perimeters, Air Quality, Water Monitoring

Industry Challenge: Environmental monitoring networks (air quality, water, perimeter security) require distributed sensors in remote or exposed locations. Battery limitations constrain:

Deployment density (maintenance cost limits sensor count)
Data frequency (sleep cycles reduce granularity)
Network reliability (sporadic failures, data gaps)
Environmental compliance (regulatory monitoring requires 24/7 uptime)

Global environmental monitoring market: €4.5B annually, with battery-powered sensors representing 60% of deployed base. Why Current Solutions Fail:

Coverage Gaps: High battery replacement cost limits sensor density
Sleep Cycles: Miss pollution events, water contamination spikes
Weather Exposure: Outdoor sensors fail prematurely
Compliance Risk: Data gaps create regulatory liability

VENDOR.Zero Technical Approach: Always-on sensing with no battery replacement. Target: Dense monitoring networks with years of continuous data. Designed for outdoor exposure, regulatory compliance, real-time alerting. Target Use Cases:

Air quality monitoring (urban, industrial, roadside)
Water quality sensors (rivers, reservoirs, wastewater)
Perimeter security (borders, facilities, protected areas)
Wildlife monitoring (conservation, migration tracking)
Radiation monitoring (nuclear facilities, emergency response)

Modeled Economics (200-sensor environmental network): Baseline:

Deployment: €100K
Annual replacement (35% outdoor rate): €35K
10-year total: €450K

Target (VENDOR.Zero):

Deployment: €150K
Annual maintenance: €10K
10-year total: €250K

Projected Savings: €200K (44% reduction) Compliance Benefit: Continuous data eliminates regulatory gaps Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Assumes outdoor conditions reduce battery life to 2.8-year average vs 15-year VENDOR target. Development Status:

Lab validation complete
Pilot discussions with municipal environmental agencies
Target: Urban deployment Q3 2026

VENDOR.Zero Applications

Five target markets for micro-power autonomous sensing

Smart Buildings

HVAC optimization, CO₂ monitoring, leak detection, occupancy sensing

71% cost reduction

Security Systems

Smart locks, cameras, motion sensors, access control

Zero security downtime

Industrial Monitoring

Pressure, vibration, temperature, leak detection in harsh environments

64% cost reduction

Agriculture IoT

Soil moisture, weather stations, irrigation, livestock monitoring

Install-and-forget

Environmental Sensing

Air quality, water monitoring, perimeter security, compliance data

44% cost reduction

VENDOR.Max Applications (Power Nodes)

Off-Grid Housing — Cabins, Remote Facilities, Research Stations

Industry Challenge: Off-grid living and remote facilities traditionally rely on diesel generators, solar+battery systems, or limited grid connections. Each approach creates burdens:

Diesel: €8K-20K annual fuel + maintenance, logistics dependency, noise, emissions
Solar+Battery: High CAPEX (€30K-80K), 5-10 year battery replacement, weather-dependent
Grid Extension: €50K-200K per km, often economically prohibitive

Global off-grid housing market: 1.5M new installations annually, with 60% using diesel or solar+battery systems. Why Current Solutions Fail:

Diesel: Fuel logistics in remote areas, noise pollution, ongoing costs
Solar: Winter/cloudy regions underperform, battery replacement expensive
Battery Storage: Degradation, thermal management, disposal burden
Grid: Prohibitive connection costs for truly remote locations

VENDOR.Max Technical Approach: Modular solid-state generation (2.4-12 kW) designed for residential/small facility use. No fuel delivery, no battery storage, no weather dependency. Target: Install-once, 20-year autonomous operation. Target Use Cases:

Mountain cabins (year-round use)
Remote research stations (Arctic, desert, wilderness)
Off-grid eco-resorts
Emergency shelters
Mobile labs and field stations

Modeled Economics (6 kW off-grid cabin): Baseline (Diesel):

Generator (8 kW): €8K
Fuel (4,000 hrs/year): €6K/year
Maintenance: €2K/year
10-year total: €8K + €80K = €88K

Baseline (Solar+Battery):

Solar array (8 kW): €20K
Battery bank (20 kWh): €15K
Balance of system: €10K
Battery replacement (year 7): €18K
10-year total: €63K

Target (VENDOR.Max 6 kW):

System: €25K
Installation: €5K
Annual maintenance: €500
10-year total: €35K

Projected Savings: €53K vs diesel (60%), €28K vs solar (44%) Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Modeled economics assume residential load profile (4,000 hrs/year avg) and temperate climate for solar comparison. Development Status:

TRL 5-6 (laboratory validation)
Prototype specifications defined for 6 kW residential configuration
Off-grid pilot partner identification Q1 2026
Target: First residential installation Q4 2026

Telecom & Connectivity — Remote Towers, Edge Computing, Backup Power

Industry Challenge: Telecom infrastructure in remote locations creates massive operational burdens. Industry data shows:

Remote tower sites: €20K-40K annual OPEX (fuel, maintenance, security)
Diesel theft: 20-40% fuel losses in vulnerable regions (Global Telecom Infrastructure Report 2024)
Generator maintenance: Every 500-1,000 hours, requiring technician site visits
Grid unreliability: 5-15% downtime in weak-grid regions

For operators with 500+ remote sites, annual operational costs exceed €10M, with significant revenue losses from service interruptions. Why Current Solutions Fail:

Diesel Generators: Theft, maintenance burden, logistics complexity, QoS penalties from downtime
Battery Backup: 3-5 year replacement cycle, limited duration, thermal management
Grid Extension: €50K-200K per km, prohibitive for truly remote sites
Solar Hybrid: Weather-dependent, requires battery storage, complex management

VENDOR.Max Technical Approach: Solid-state power nodes (2.4-12 kW) designed for telecom infrastructure. No consumables to steal, no scheduled maintenance, continuous operation. Target: 99%+ uptime with remote monitoring only (subject to certification and field validation). Target Use Cases:

Remote 5G tower sites (3-12 kW loads)
Edge computing nodes (distributed AI/processing)
Base station backup power (grid-tied with automatic failover)
Emergency communications (disaster response connectivity)
Satellite ground stations

Modeled Economics (12 kW remote tower site): Baseline (Diesel):

Generator (15 kW): €10K
Annual fuel: €12K
Theft losses (30%): €3.6K
Maintenance: €6K
Security: €4K
10-year total: €10K + €256K = €266K

Target (VENDOR.Max 12 kW):

System: €40K
Installation: €8K
Annual maintenance: €1K
10-year total: €58K

Projected Savings: €208K per site (78% reduction) For 500-site network: €104M over 10 years Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Economic modeling based on industry-reported diesel theft rates and maintenance schedules. Actual savings subject to site-specific conditions and validation. Development Status:

Core architecture validated (1000+ lab hours)
Pilot discussions with Nordic and Southeast Asian telecom operators
Target: First tower pilot Q2 2027
Commercial availability: 2028+ (pending certification)

Infrastructure Nodes — Roads, Tunnels, Water Systems, Public Facilities

Industry Challenge: Public infrastructure requires power in locations where grid connection is expensive or unreliable:

Highway systems (lighting, signage, sensors)
Tunnel ventilation and emergency systems
Water/wastewater monitoring stations
Public facilities (restrooms, shelters, info kiosks)

Grid extension costs (€50K-200K per km) often exceed project budgets. Diesel generators create ongoing OPEX, maintenance burden, and emissions concerns. Municipal infrastructure departments report 15-25% of operational budgets consumed by remote site power costs (Urban Infrastructure Association 2024). Why Current Solutions Fail:

Grid Extension: Prohibitive CAPEX for distributed nodes
Diesel: Ongoing fuel, maintenance, theft risk, emissions
Solar: Weather-dependent, requires battery storage, winter limitations
Battery Alone: Limited duration, frequent replacement, environmental waste

VENDOR.Max Technical Approach: Distributed power nodes (2.4-6 kW) for infrastructure applications. No grid connection required, no fuel logistics, minimal maintenance. Target: Municipal-scale deployment with 20-year asset life. Target Use Cases:

Highway lighting and signage (LED systems, variable message signs)
Tunnel safety systems (ventilation, emergency lighting, communications)
Water/wastewater monitoring (remote pumping stations, quality sensors)
Public facility power (parks, rest areas, transit shelters)
Traffic management (smart intersections, adaptive signals)

Modeled Economics (3 kW infrastructure node): Baseline (Diesel):

Generator (5 kW): €6K
Annual fuel: €4K
Maintenance: €2K
10-year total: €66K

Baseline (Solar+Battery):

Solar (5 kW): €12K
Battery (10 kWh): €8K
Installation: €5K
Battery replacement (year 7): €10K
10-year total: €35K

Target (VENDOR.Max 3 kW):

System: €15K
Installation: €4K
Annual maintenance: €500
10-year total: €24K

Projected Savings: €42K vs diesel (64%), €11K vs solar (31%) For 100-node network: €1.1M-4.2M savings Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Solar comparison assumes temperate climate with adequate sunlight. Diesel comparison assumes accessible fuel delivery. Development Status:

Municipal pilot partner discussions underway
Target infrastructure use cases: Traffic, water, public facilities
First pilot deployment: Q3 2027

Mobility & Transport — Small Charging, Depots, Autonomous Equipment

Industry Challenge: Electrification of transport creates distributed charging needs:

EV charging in areas without grid access
Electric fleet depots (buses, trucks, delivery vehicles)
Autonomous equipment charging (drones, robots, AGVs)
Remote charging stations (parks, trails, rural routes)

Current solutions require grid extension (expensive) or diesel generators (defeats environmental purpose). Battery storage alone provides limited capacity and requires frequent recharging. Transportation electrification market: €800B projected by 2030, with distributed charging representing 15-20% of infrastructure needs. Why Current Solutions Fail:

Grid Extension: €50K-200K per km for remote charging points
Diesel Generators: Emissions contradict EV environmental value
Battery Storage: Limited capacity, requires grid recharge, replacement cycle
Solar Charging: Weather-dependent, low power density, nighttime limitations

VENDOR.Max Technical Approach: Distributed charging nodes (6-24 kW) for transport electrification. No grid dependency, continuous availability, weather-independent operation. Target: Rural and remote charging infrastructure. Target Use Cases:

Rural EV charging (trails, parks, remote routes)
Electric bus/truck depots (overnight charging)
Drone charging stations (delivery, inspection, agriculture)
Autonomous vehicle support (robots, AGVs, specialty vehicles)
Emergency vehicle charging (remote disaster response)

Modeled Economics (12 kW charging station): Baseline (Grid Extension 5 km):

Grid connection: €250K-1M
Annual utility: €5K
10-year total: €300K-1.05M

Baseline (Diesel Generator):

Generator (15 kW): €10K
Annual fuel: €8K
Maintenance: €3K
10-year total: €120K

Target (VENDOR.Max 12 kW):

System: €40K
Installation: €8K
Annual maintenance: €1K
10-year total: €58K

Projected Savings: €242K-992K vs grid, €62K vs diesel Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Grid extension economics highly variable based on distance and terrain. Charging station modeled for light-duty vehicles (12 kW continuous). Development Status:

Architecture intended for DC charging applications (integration and validation pending)
Fleet operator discussions planned Q2 2026
Target: Fleet pilot Q1 2027

Emergency & Public Safety — Disaster Relief, Field Hospitals, Command Centers

Industry Challenge: Emergency response operations require rapid power deployment in crisis conditions:

Natural disasters (hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, wildfires)
Field hospitals and medical facilities
Command and coordination centers
Emergency communications infrastructure

Traditional power solutions fail in disaster scenarios:

Grid: Often destroyed or unavailable
Diesel: Fuel supply disrupted, logistics breakdown, storage risks
Solar: Weather-dependent (storms = no generation)
Batteries: Limited duration, recharge requires grid/generator

U.S. military data (2007-2010 Afghanistan) showed 1 casualty per 24 fuel convoys in contested regions, with fuel logistics representing 80% of supply chain exposure. Why Current Solutions Fail:

Diesel Dependency: Fuel supply chain vulnerable during disasters
Duration Uncertainty: Unknown crisis length creates fuel anxiety
Logistics Complexity: One more critical resource to manage
Personnel Risk: Fuel handling, generator operation, convoy exposure

VENDOR.Max Technical Approach: Field-deployable power nodes (12-24 kW) designed for emergency response. No fuel logistics, indefinite duration, weather-independent operation. Target: Helicopter/truck portable, operational within hours. Target Use Cases:

Disaster response command stations
Field hospitals and temporary medical facilities
Emergency communications infrastructure
Relief operations centers and distribution hubs
Search and rescue base camps
Military forward operating bases (FOBs)

Modeled Economics (24 kW field hospital): Baseline (Diesel):

Generator (30 kW): €15K
Fuel (30 days operation): €12K
Transport/setup: €5K
Total (30-day deployment): €32K

Target (VENDOR.Max 24 kW):

System (portable cluster): €80K
Transport (one-time): €10K
Operation (30 days): €0
Total (30-day deployment): €90K first deployment
Subsequent deployments: €0 fuel costs

Value Proposition:

First deployment: Higher CAPEX, but zero fuel logistics
Subsequent uses: Reusable asset, no recurring costs
Duration: Designed for long-duration operation without consumables (not fuel-limited)
Personnel: No fuel handling risks

Strategic Value (Non-Economic): For Disaster Response:

Logistics simplification (no fuel supply chain)
Duration certainty (operates as long as crisis lasts)
Personnel safety (no fuel handling/transport)
Rapid deployment (no fuel infrastructure setup)

For Military Applications:

Convoy risk elimination (fuel logistics exposure)
Tactical advantage (reduced operational signature)
Persistent presence (multi-year FOB autonomy)
Force protection (casualty risk reduction)

Note: These models are illustrative based on industry data, not VENDOR field performance. Economic comparison assumes diesel availability, which is often disrupted in disaster scenarios. VENDOR value increases significantly when fuel logistics compromised. Development Status:

Portable configuration specifications defined
Government/defense pilot discussions planned
Target: Emergency response demonstration Q4 2026
Defense pilot: 2027 (pending security clearances)

VENDOR.Max Applications

Five target markets for kilowatt-scale autonomous power nodes

Off-Grid Housing

Cabins, remote facilities, research stations, eco-resorts

60% savings vs diesel

Telecom Towers

Remote 5G sites, edge computing, backup power, satellite ground stations

78% cost reduction

Infrastructure Nodes

Highway lighting, tunnel systems, water stations, public facilities

64% savings vs diesel

EV Charging

Rural charging, fleet depots, drone stations, autonomous vehicle support

$242K-992K savings

Emergency Response

Disaster relief, field hospitals, command centers, search & rescue

Zero fuel logistics

ThreeTarget Scenarios (Detailed)

These scenarios illustrate how VENDOR technology would address specific real-world challenges in demanding environments. Each represents a target deployment once field validation is complete.

Scenario 1: Arctic Telecom Tower (Northern Canada)

Industry Context

Northern telecom operators face extreme deployment challenges. Sites located 200+ km from nearest roads are accessible only by helicopter or seasonal ice roads (3 months annually). Industry reports indicate:

Diesel delivery: €400-600K annually per site (helicopter transport)
Generator maintenance: €20K+ per visit (technician travel + parts)
Service reliability: 85-90% (weather, logistics, equipment failures)

Source: Arctic Telecom Operators Report 2023

Technical Requirements

Power: 12 kW continuous (5G equipment, edge computing, environmental systems)
Environment: -40°C to +50°C operation required
Access: Minimal service visits (annual at most)
Reliability: 99%+ uptime (regulatory QoS requirements)

Current Approach (Diesel)

Annual Costs:

Fuel delivery (6 helicopter trips): €48K
Maintenance visits (4 per year): €20K
Parts and consumables: €8K
Security monitoring: €6K

Total Annual OPEX: €82K 10-Year Total: €250K (CAPEX) + €820K (OPEX) = €1.07M

Operational Issues

3-month logistics window (ice road season)
Weather-dependent helicopter access
Generator failure in winter = potential weeks offline
Environmental risk (diesel spills in Arctic ecosystem)

VENDOR.Max Target Solution

Configuration: 12 kW solid-state cluster (modular redundancy for critical infrastructure) Deployment Plan:

One-time helicopter installation
No fuel storage infrastructure
Remote monitoring via satellite link
Service visits: Annual inspection only (optional)

Target Economics

CAPEX:

VENDOR.Max 12 kW system: €45K
Helicopter installation: €12K
Remote monitoring: €3K

Total CAPEX: €60K Annual OPEX:

Fuel: €0
Scheduled maintenance: €1K (remote diagnostics)
Annual inspection: €3K (optional)

Total Annual OPEX: €4K 10-Year Total: €60K + €40K = €100K Projected Savings: €970K over 10 years (91% reduction) Payback Period: <12 months

Additional Benefits

Environmental: Zero diesel spills, minimal ecological footprint
Reliability: Target 99%+ uptime (subject to certification and field validation, no refueling interruptions)
Predictability: No fuel price volatility, fixed lifecycle costs
Regulatory: Meets Arctic environmental standards

Development Timeline

Q4 2025: Environmental chamber testing (-40°C validation)
Q2 2026: Telecom pilot partner selection
Q4 2026: First Arctic site preparation
Q2 2027: Initial deployment and monitoring
Q4 2027: Performance validation and expansion discussion

Note: Scenario based on industry-reported costs and operational challenges. Economics modeled based on existing industry benchmarks. Actual performance subject to field validation in Arctic conditions.

Scenario 2: Smart City Sensor Network (Singapore)

Industry Context

Modern cities deploy thousands of environmental, traffic, and infrastructure sensors. Singapore’s Smart Nation initiative includes 15,000+ sensors across urban infrastructure. Current challenges:

Battery replacement: 40% of sensors annually (2.5-year avg life)
Annual cost: €1.5M-2M (batteries + labor + logistics)
Data gaps: Sensors sleep to conserve power, miss critical events
Environmental waste: 6,000 batteries disposed annually

Source: Singapore Smart City Development Report 2024

Technical Requirements

Power: 3.3-5V DC per sensor (low-power IoT devices)
Environment: Outdoor tropical conditions (high humidity, heat, UV)
Lifespan: 15-20 years target (vs 2-5 year battery baseline)
Data: Always-on sensing (no sleep cycles)

Current Approach (Battery-Powered)

Initial Deployment:

15,000 sensors @ €100 each: €1.5M
Installation labor: €2M

Total Initial: €3.5M Annual Costs:

Battery replacement (6,000 sensors/year): €480K
Labor (replacement technicians): €750K
Logistics (scheduling, dispatch, access): €300K
Battery disposal: €50K

Total Annual OPEX: €1.58M 10-Year Total: €3.5M + €15.8M = €19.3M

Operational Issues

115 service calls per week (reactive maintenance)
Data gaps during sleep cycles
Unpredictable failure patterns
Environmental disposal burden

VENDOR.Zero Target Solution

Configuration: 15,000 sensors with integrated VENDOR.Zero modules (3.3-5V DC) Deployment Plan:

Phased replacement during normal maintenance cycles
VENDOR modules integrated at sensor manufacturing
Remote monitoring infrastructure (city-wide network)
No scheduled battery replacements

Target Economics

CAPEX:

15,000 sensors + VENDOR.Zero modules @ €150 each: €2.25M
Installation (same as baseline): €2M

Total CAPEX: €4.25M Annual OPEX:

Battery replacement: €0
Maintenance (remote monitoring + occasional sensor failures): €150K

Total Annual OPEX: €150K 10-Year Total: €4.25M + €1.5M = €5.75M Projected Savings: €13.55M over 10 years (70% reduction) Payback Period: ~3 years

Additional Benefits

Environmental: 60,000 batteries eliminated over 10 years
Data quality: Always-on sensing, no sleep cycles, continuous AI/edge processing
Operations: Service calls reduced by 95% (115/week → <5/week)
Reliability: Predictable maintenance, no reactive emergencies

Development Timeline

Q1 2026: IoT integration specifications finalized
Q3 2026: Pilot deployment (100-500 sensors)
Q1 2027: Performance validation and expansion approval
Q3 2027: City-wide rollout (phased over 12-18 months)

Note: Economics modeled based on existing industry benchmarks, assuming outdoor tropical conditions and 15-year VENDOR operational life vs 2.5-year battery baseline. Actual performance subject to field validation.

Scenario 3: Defense Border Station (Middle East Desert)

Industry Context

Military border monitoring stations in remote/contested regions face critical logistics challenges. Historical U.S. military data (Afghanistan 2007-2010) documented:

1 casualty per 24 fuel convoys (IED attacks, ambushes)
Fuel logistics: 80% of supply chain exposure
3,000+ convoys annually across theater

Modern border stations require 12-18 kW continuous power for:

Surveillance systems (radar, cameras, sensors)
Communications infrastructure
Personnel facilities (climate control, life support)
Emergency response equipment

Source: U.S. Army Logistics Analysis 2011

Technical Requirements

Power: 18 kW continuous (mission-critical 24/7 operation)
Environment: Desert conditions (50°C day, -5°C night)
Autonomy: Multi-year operation without resupply
Security: Minimal operational signature (acoustic, thermal, logistics pattern)

Current Approach (Diesel)

Logistics:

Weekly fuel convoy (52 per year)
Convoy security: 4-6 personnel, armored vehicles
Convoy cost: €10K per trip (fuel + security + vehicle depreciation)

Annual Convoy Cost: €520K Additional Costs:

Generator maintenance: €15K/year
Fuel storage infrastructure: €5K/year (security, monitoring)
Personnel exposure: 52 convoy risk events annually

Total Annual Cost: €540K 10-Year Total: €150K (CAPEX) + €5.4M = €5.55M

Operational Issues

Predictable logistics pattern (adversary intelligence)
Acoustic signature (85 dB, detectable 500+ meters)
Thermal signature (IR-visible exhaust from aerial surveillance)
Fuel storage vulnerability (high-value sabotage target)
Personnel casualty risk (convoy attacks)

VENDOR.Max Target Solution

Configuration: 18 kW solid-state cluster (N+1 redundancy for mission-critical operations) Deployment Plan:

One-time secure installation (heavy-lift helicopter during stable period)
No fuel storage infrastructure
Remote monitoring via secure satellite link
Multi-year autonomous operation

Target Economics

CAPEX:

VENDOR.Max 18 kW cluster: €65K
Secure installation (one-time): €15K
Remote monitoring: €5K

Total CAPEX: €85K Annual OPEX:

Fuel convoys: €0
Maintenance (remote diagnostics only): €2K

Total Annual OPEX: €2K 10-Year Total: €85K + €20K = €105K Projected Savings: €5.45M over 10 years (98% reduction) Payback Period: <2 months

Strategic Value (Non-Economic)

Casualty Risk Reduction:

52 convoys/year eliminated = 520 convoys over 10 years
Regional casualty rate: ~1 per 100 convoys
Eliminating convoys could avoid multiple risk events over lifecycle (illustrative modeling based on 2007–2010 Afghanistan data)

Tactical Advantages:

Zero Logistics Signature: No predictable convoy pattern for adversary intelligence
Minimal Acoustic Signature: Solid-state operation vs 85 dB diesel generator
Reduced Thermal Signature: No combustion exhaust for IR detection
No Fuel Storage: Eliminates high-value sabotage target

Operational Benefits:

Multi-year autonomy (no resupply timeline)
Forward positioning unconstrained by logistics
Extended mission duration capability
Persistent presence in denied areas

Development Timeline

Q1 2026: Security clearance process initiated
Q3 2026: Classified defense briefing
Q2 2027: Field trial site selection (secure facility)
Q4 2027: Pilot deployment and monitoring
2028: Performance validation and acquisition discussion

Note: Scenario based on declassified U.S. military logistics data. Economics modeled using existing benchmarks. Actual deployment subject to security clearances and field validation.

Three Target Scenarios

Real-world deployment examples in demanding environments

Northern Canada

Arctic Telecom Tower

12 kW remote 5G site, -40°C to +50°C

10-Year Savings

€970K

91% cost reduction

Helicopter-accessible only sites
Zero diesel spills in Arctic ecosystem
99%+ uptime target (no refueling gaps)
Payback period: <12 months

Singapore

Smart City Network

15,000 sensors, tropical outdoor conditions

10-Year Savings

€13.55M

70% cost reduction

60,000 batteries eliminated over 10 years
Service calls reduced 95% (115/week → <5/week)
Always-on sensing (no sleep cycles)
Payback period: ~3 years

Middle East

Border Station

18 kW defense installation, 50°C desert

10-Year Savings

€5.45M

98% cost reduction

520 fuel convoys eliminated (10 years)
Zero logistics signature (no predictable pattern)
Minimal acoustic/thermal signature
Payback period: <2 months

Strategic Advantages of Solid-State Power Architecture

Across all applications described above, VENDOR’s solid-state architecture delivers five fundamental advantages. These are inherent architectural properties, not performance claims:

1.Supply Chain Immunity

What It Means

No fuel imports (no OPEC/geopolitics dependency)
No battery supply chains (no lithium, cobalt, rare earths)
No consumables (no filters, oils, replacement parts)
No foreign dependencies (all components European/Allied sourced)

Why It Matters

Post-2022 energy crisis demonstrated that supply chain dependency = strategic vulnerability. Technologies requiring continuous imports create operational exposure to:

Sanctions and embargoes
Resource scarcity and price volatility
Geopolitical conflicts
Logistics disruption

VENDOR architecture eliminates these dependencies. Once installed, systems are intended to operate independently of global supply chains.

Target Applications Most Affected

Defense and government (national security implications)
Critical infrastructure (strategic sovereignty)
Remote operations (logistics constraints)

2. Predictable Economics

What It Means

Known CAPEX (one-time installation cost)
Minimal OPEX (remote monitoring only)
No fuel price volatility
No surprise maintenance costs
No replacement cycles

Why It Matters

Traditional energy solutions create unpredictable lifecycle costs:

Diesel: Fuel price volatility (OPEC, geopolitics, taxation)
Batteries: Replacement cycle uncertainty (degradation varies)
Solar: Weather variability, grid backup costs
Maintenance: Unpredictable failure patterns

VENDOR target economics: Fixed CAPEX + predictable minimal OPEX = accurate 20-year TCO modeling.

Target Applications Most Affected

Commercial/industrial (CFO budget certainty)
Municipal infrastructure (long-term capital planning)
Telecom (predictable site operating costs)

3. Environmental Responsibility

What It Means

Zero emissions (no combustion, no exhaust)
Zero battery waste (no electrochemical disposal)
Minimal footprint (compact, silent, low-signature)
Long lifespan (15-20 years, not 2-5)

Why It Matters

Regulatory pressure and ESG requirements increasingly mandate:

Carbon neutrality goals (corporate and national)
Battery Regulation EU 2023/1542 (lifecycle responsibility)
Environmental compliance (Arctic, protected areas, urban)
Circular economy principles (durability over disposability)

VENDOR architecture aligns with regulatory trajectory. No combustion, no batteries to dispose, infrastructure-grade lifespan.

Target Applications Most Affected

Smart cities (ESG mandates)
Protected environments (Arctic, wilderness, marine)
Corporate infrastructure (sustainability commitments)

4. Operational Simplicity

What It Means

Install-and-forget (no scheduled maintenance)
No training required (autonomous operation)
Remote monitoring (no field technicians)
Plug-and-play deployment

Why It Matters

Complex systems create operational burden:

Diesel: Training, fuel handling, safety protocols, maintenance schedules
Batteries: Thermal management, degradation monitoring, replacement logistics
Solar: Weather forecasting, grid integration, backup coordination

VENDOR target: Deploy once, monitor remotely, service only when actual failure occurs (not preventively).

Target Applications Most Affected

Remote operations (limited access, high service costs)
Large-scale deployments (thousands of units)
Critical infrastructure (uptime requirements)

5. Long-Term Durability (Design Target)

What It Means

15-20 year operational lifespan (design target)
Solid-state architecture (no moving parts to wear)
No degradation (no battery capacity fade, no engine wear)
Infrastructure-grade reliability

Why It Matters

Short-lived systems create:

Replacement cycle costs (batteries every 3-5 years)
Premature obsolescence (sensors limited by battery life)
Asset depreciation (diesel generators 5-10 year life)
Environmental waste (frequent disposal)

VENDOR design target: 20-year service life matching infrastructure depreciation schedules.

Target Applications Most Affected

Municipal infrastructure (long capital planning cycles)
IoT sensor networks (install-and-forget requirement)
Off-grid facilities (access difficulty, high replacement costs)

Note: Lifespan targets based on solid-state architecture analysis and accelerated lab testing. Actual field lifespan subject to environmental validation and certification.

Why These Applications Are Shown Before TRL 7

All application scenarios on this page represent the strategic roadmap, not current deployments. This is standard for deep-tech energy systems: the applications become commercially deployable only when:

TRL 7: field prototypes validated in operational environments
Certification (CE/UL): safety and compliance confirmed
TRL 8–9: systems proven through real-world mission operations

At TRL 5–6, VENDOR has validated the core physics and architecture in the laboratory. Applications shown here reflect where the technology will create value once field validation is complete — not performance claims today. This ensures full transparency for investors, partners, and regulators.

Five Fundamental Advantages

Inherent architectural properties of solid-state energy generation

Supply Chain Immunity

No fuel • No batteries • No consumables

Zero dependency on global supply chains once installed

Predictable Economics

Fixed CAPEX • Minimal OPEX

Accurate 20-year TCO modeling without volatility

Environmental Responsibility

Zero emissions • Zero waste

15-20 year lifespan, no battery disposal

Operational Simplicity

Install-and-forget

Remote monitoring, no scheduled maintenance

Long-Term Durability

15-20 year lifespan

Solid-state design, no moving parts to wear

Technical Roadmap: TRL 5-6 to Commercialization

Transparency is critical for investor confidence and pilot partner planning.

Current Status: TRL 5-6 (Laboratory Validation Complete)

What This Means

VENDOR technology has completed laboratory-scale validation:

1000+ hours of laboratory-level continuous operation data (bench testing under controlled conditions)
Core physics principles validated (impulse-discharge regime)
Load response characteristics measured (startup, steady-state, transient)
Temperature performance tested (-20°C to +50°C lab conditions)
Modular scalability demonstrated (parallel operation of multiple units)
Patent protection secured (PCT WO2024209235, Spanish patent granted)

What This Does NOT Mean

Field-deployed prototypes (no real-world installations yet)
Environmental validation (Arctic, desert, tropical conditions not field-tested)
Certification complete (CE/UL process begins after Seed round)
Commercial product availability (applications described = target roadmap)
Customer deployments (scenarios = modeled, not operational)

Immediate Next Steps: Laboratory Rebuild (Q1 2026 → Q4 2026)

Current Situation

VENDOR operated from temporary laboratory facilities through 2024. To advance from TRL 5–6 to TRL 7, dedicated laboratory infrastructure is required.

Rebuild Objectives

Permanent testing facility with calibrated instrumentation
Environmental chambers (−40°C to +60°C, humidity, vibration)
Load banks for full-power testing (up to 24 kW configurations)
Emissions and acoustic measurement equipment
Accelerated lifetime testing rigs
Safety compliance infrastructure (ventilation, monitoring, fire suppression)

Timeline

Facility selection and design
Construction and equipment installation
Calibration and commissioning
Validation testing resumed

Funding Requirement: Seed Round

TRL 7 Milestone: Field Pilots (2026-2027)

Definition

TRL 7 = “System prototype demonstration in operational environment”

Plan

Once laboratory infrastructure is operational, VENDOR will begin transitioning to field pilots:

Phase 1: Controlled Field Tests

Friendly environments (accessible, monitored, non-critical)
Partner facilities with technical supervision
Applications: Off-grid housing, building sensors, accessible telecom sites
Objective: Validate environmental performance, identify field-specific issues

Phase 2: Operational Pilots

Real-world conditions (remote, harsh, critical infrastructure)
Paying pilot partners (subsidized pricing, performance guarantees)
Applications: Telecom, defense, smart city, emergency response
Objective: Validate economics, reliability, maintenance requirements

Phase 3: Pilot Validation

Data collection and analysis (12+ months operational data)
Independent validation (DNV, TÜV, or equivalent)
Customer testimonials and case studies
Certification preparation

Expected Outcome: TRL 7 complete by 2027, commercial readiness follows certification

TRL 8-9: Certification & Commercial Scale (2028+)

TRL 8

“System complete and qualified” = Certification achieved

Certification Roadmap

CE marking (European market access)
UL certification (North American commercial/industrial)
Military specifications (defense applications, if pursued)
Telecom standards (ETSI, 3GPP for network equipment)

Timeline: 12–18 months from pilot data (assuming successful validation)

TRL 9

“System proven through successful mission operations” = Customer deployments Expected: 2028–2029 for initial commercial deployments, scaling 2029+

What This Means for Applications Described Above

All Applications on This Page

All applications on this page represent strategic targets based on:

Technical analysis (architecture suitable for use case)
Industry research (pain points, economics, market size)
Laboratory validation (core physics confirmed)
Regulatory assessment (certification pathways identified)

What They Do NOT Represent

Proven deployments (no customer installations yet)
Guaranteed performance (field validation pending)
Commercial availability (TRL 7-9 required first)
Committed timelines (subject to funding, validation, certification)

Honest Assessment

If you are evaluating VENDOR for:

Investment: You’re betting on TRL 5-6 → TRL 7-9 transition (2026-2028)
Pilot Partnership: Earliest meaningful pilots = Q3 2026 (lab rebuild complete)
Commercial Deployment: Realistic timeline = 2028+ (certification required)
Strategic Partnership: Now is the time to engage (shape product roadmap)

For Investors (SAFE Round Active)

Early Access to Category-Creating Technology

VENDOR is raising a SAFE round to fund laboratory rebuild and the TRL 6 → TRL 7 transition.

Investment Thesis

Validated physics (1000+ hours of laboratory data)
Large validated markets: • VENDOR.Zero TAM: €41–48B → €92–95B • VENDOR.Max TAM: €362–426B → €2.17T
Defensible IP (PCT patent, trade secrets)
Experienced team (deeptech, energy, commercialization)
Clear path to revenue (pilot programs, followed by commercial rollout post-certification)

Risks

Technology risk (TRL 5–6, field validation pending)
Certification uncertainty (12–18 month process, outcomes not guaranteed)
Market adoption (novel technology, education required)
Competition (incumbents, alternative approaches)

Next Steps

Access data room (qualified investors only)
Review financial projections and use of funds

For Pilot Partners (Telecom, Defense, Smart City, Infrastructure)

Shape Product Development, Get Early Access

VENDOR is seeking pilot partners for upcoming field trials. Ideal partners:

Face significant energy challenges (diesel costs, battery replacement, grid unreliability)
Have accessible test sites (monitored, non-critical initially)
Can provide technical feedback (performance data, operational insights)
Seek strategic advantage (early adopter positioning, sustainability goals)

What We Offer

Subsidized pilot pricing (below future commercial rates)
Co-development influence (shape product to real operational needs)
Defined performance criteria (agreed success metrics)
Technical support (monitoring, troubleshooting, optimization)

What We Need

Real-world deployment environment
Access to operational performance data (power, uptime, environmental conditions)
Structured feedback on operational issues
Permission to develop case studies and testimonials if results are successful

For Strategic Partners (OEM, System Integrators, Distributors)

Integrate Breakthrough Technology into Your Product Lines

VENDOR is open to strategic partnerships:

OEM integration (sensors, equipment, systems incorporating VENDOR power)
System integration (package VENDOR with complementary technologies)
Distribution agreements (regional/vertical market access)
Co-development (customize VENDOR for specific applications)

Ideal Partners

IoT device manufacturers (sensor companies, building automation)
Telecom equipment providers (base station, edge computing)
Infrastructure systems integrators (smart city, public safety)
Emergency response equipment suppliers

Timeline

Technical discussions: Now (architecture, integration requirements)
Pilot integration: 2026 (when lab rebuild complete)
Commercial partnerships: 2028+ (post-certification)

For Media & Analysts (Press, Industry Research)

Honest, Transparent Technology Story

VENDOR is available for:

Technical briefings (architecture, validation status)
Industry analysis (market positioning, competitive landscape)
Trend discussions (energy sovereignty, supply chain immunity)
Founder interviews (vision, roadmap, challenges)

Press Kit Includes

Company backgrounder
Technology overview (accessible language)
Application scenarios
High-resolution images and diagrams
Founder bio and contact information