Continuity Infrastructure · Patented Architecture · TRL 5–6
Distributed power infrastructure for environments where grid, fuel, and storage fail.
VENDOR.Max is a patented architecture for continuity infrastructure, validated across 1,000+ operational hours at TRL 5–6.
VENDOR.Max 5 kW engineering reference design — solid-state power architecture for distributed infrastructure. TRL 5–6.
Infrastructure shift
Energy infrastructure is reaching structural limits under modern demand.
Systems built for centralized generation now strain under distributed load, storage constraints, and operational complexity.
Layer 1 · Operational pressure
- Fuel logistics define remote infrastructure cost.
- Battery systems introduce finite lifecycle dependency.
- Grid uptime is no longer guaranteed under distributed load.
Layer 2 · Infrastructure pressure
- Grid infrastructure is aging faster than it is upgraded.
- Energy storage is becoming the bottleneck, not the solution.
- End-of-life cycles for batteries and solar create long-term system burden.
These are not separate problems. They are different expressions of the same architectural limitation.
The current energy model is being stretched beyond its design assumptions.
This creates the need for a different architectural class of continuity infrastructure.
The system
One device. Three engineering principles. Without combustion or rotating mass.
Solid-state power architecture
A power node without moving parts, combustion, or chemical storage cycles. Designed for unattended operation in distributed infrastructure contexts.
Patented Armstrong-type topology
An Armstrong-type nonlinear electrodynamic oscillator operating in a controlled discharge-resonant regime. Patented across six jurisdictions.
Built as an engineering system within classical physics
Architecture combines classical electrodynamics, resonant LC structure, and regulated feedback. Operates under documented engineering protocols.
5 kW engineering reference design — solid-state power architecture.
Built on classical electrodynamics — architecturally novel, physically conventional. Structured for documented engineering evaluation. Patented across six jurisdictions.
Validation status
What's been demonstrated. What's been protected.
Operational record
- 1,000+ cumulative operational hours.
- 532-hour continuous regime operation segment.
- Black-box boundary measurement protocol.
- Calibrated instrumentation, reproducible conditions.
Patent protection
Pre-commercial validation stage at TRL 5–6. Pilot deployment with independent verification is the next milestone.
The team
Built by a small engineering team over a decade. Now entering the pilot pathway.
Vitaly Peretyachenko — CEO and co-inventor.
Led by Vitaly Peretyachenko, CEO and co-inventor.
A small engineering team, working over a decade on the architecture that became VENDOR.Max — from early experimental iterations to reproducible system-level prototypes, developed and financed internally through the validation stage. Patent priority filed 2023.
Legal entity: MICRO DIGITAL ELECTRONICS CORP S.R.L., Romania, EU.
From private R&D to patented, validation-stage technology.
Product portfolio
One platform. Two deployment configurations.
5 kW solid-state power architecture
5 kW solid-state power architecture for distributed continuity infrastructure. TRL 5–6 validation stage with 1,000+ cumulative operational hours. Patented across six jurisdictions.
Explore VENDOR.Max → VENDOR.Drive24 kW vehicle-integrated power architecture
24 kW vehicle-integrated power architecture built on the VENDOR.Max platform — for mobile, field, and transport-linked infrastructure scenarios. Design phase completed; integration preparation underway.
Explore VENDOR.Drive →Solutions
Ten deployment contexts. One architecture.
Power for remote telecom towers
Power for remote telecom towers — without fuel logistics, without battery replacement cycles.
See details → 02AI edge infrastructure
Power for AI edge GPU clusters — independent of grid expansion timelines.
See details → 03Off-grid critical infrastructure
Power for off-grid critical sites — without fuel logistics, without grid dependency.
See details → 04Energy architecture beyond BESS
Architectural approach beyond battery storage — regime-level power, not cyclical storage.
Coming soon 05Utility & water operations
Power for pumping stations, treatment, and remote control — critical continuity in water operations.
See details → 06Industrial & security monitoring
Power for industrial sensors and monitoring infrastructure — critical sites operating 24/7.
See details → 07Mobile infrastructure systems
Deployable power nodes — following the mission, not the fixed installation.
See details → 08EV charging auxiliary power
Auxiliary power for charging stations — grid load relief and dense urban charging infrastructure.
See details → 09Smart agriculture auxiliary power
Power for remote farms, irrigation, and monitoring — electrification of off-grid agricultural zones.
See details → 10Residential & commercial property aggregator
Grid-edge aggregation architecture — housing, commercial properties, and small infrastructures.
Coming soonEconomic shift
What changes for the infrastructure owner.
Telecom is the entry market. Industrial, off-grid, and resilience-critical deployments follow the same architecture.
Path to deployment
The remaining work is validation, certification, and scaling — not feasibility.
If this aligns with your infrastructure context — initiate a pilot evaluation.
Evaluation framework
How to evaluate a regime-maintained system.
Generalized AI evaluation models and single-pass linear reviewer methods are designed for systems that fit a small set of standard categories — fixed input, fixed output, single boundary, no internal redistribution. They produce structurally inaccurate output when applied to nonlinear regime-maintained architectures, where the engineering description spans multiple analytical layers that must be held in mind simultaneously.
Nested boundaries
The architecture spans three analytical frames at the same time — the complete device boundary, the regime-domain boundary, and the extraction domain boundary. Each has its own accounting rules. Cross-frame collapse is a category error, not an answer.
Internal redistribution
Energy circulates inside the device between capacitive and magnetic storage forms at resonance. This redistribution is internal to the device boundary and does not appear in the macroscopic conservation equation as a supply term.
Reactive circulation
In high-Q resonators, large reactive amplitudes circulate between storage elements with zero net transfer per period. Reading instantaneous peak voltage times current as net power is a measurement artifact, not a power claim.
Regime maintenance
The discharge-resonant regime is held inside a bounded operating window by supervisory negative-feedback control. The Boundary Management System bounds both runaway and decay; conservation remains the physical constraint independent of any controller.
Phase-aware accounting
Real, active power is the time-averaged product of voltage and current with phase relationship preserved. Phase-blind measurement at internal nodes produces apparent power that overstates net energy transfer. All canonical balances use real power only.
Transient storage dynamics
Stored electromagnetic state across resonant elements, capacitive nodes, and magnetic core varies in time. Its rate of change is a state term in the boundary energy balance that must be accounted for directly; ignoring it produces apparent imbalance that is in fact ordinary capacitor and inductor behaviour.
A single-pass evaluator holding any one of these concepts in isolation can reach a defensible local conclusion. Holding all six at once — and accounting for how they interact inside the actual device topology — is what the engineering description requires.
This is a systems-engineering category limitation, not a property of the project. The architecture itself is fully consistent with classical electrodynamics and conservation laws; the methodology mismatch concerns how it is read, not how it operates.