2.4–24 kW Infrastructure Power System
for Remote and Weak-Grid Environments

Yes. VENDOR.Max is an open electrodynamic engineering system, not a closed one. A startup impulse initiates the operating regime, and device-boundary energy accounting applies throughout operation:

Sustained operation remains subject to complete device-boundary accounting under conservation of energy. System efficiency does not exceed unity: η ≤ 1 for steady-state averaged power. The system does not generate energy and does not extract energy from air or gas.

VENDOR.Max operates entirely within classical electrodynamics. It is an open electrodynamic engineering system in a controlled nonlinear resonant regime, with all energy transfer subject to conservation laws at the device boundary.

A startup impulse initiates the regime; throughout operation, the complete device-boundary energy balance remains applicable. At the complete device boundary η ≤ 1. The system remains within classical conservation constraints.

Energy accounting in VENDOR.Max is two-level: device-boundary accounting governs the complete system, and regime-level accounting describes how energy is redistributed across internal functional paths inside that boundary. Both descriptions are consistent with each other and with conservation of energy. See the dedicated question below for the full multi-level explanation.

The architectural and patent descriptions refer to one physical system at two levels of granularity — both fully consistent with each other.

Architectural description (functional grouping): Circuit A performs regime formation; Circuit B performs power extraction. A BMS coordinates between them.

Patent description (ES2950176): three windings of transformer (5), each with its own resonant capacitor, forming three independent resonant circuits. The secondary and tertiary windings are functionally grouped under Circuit B because both extract from the same shared field and are managed by the same BMS.

The two descriptions are complementary views of the same hardware. The architectural view is suited to system-level explanation; the patent view is suited to claim-level disclosure.

VENDOR.Max is designed around a hard priority hierarchy that protects the operating regime first and delivers surplus power to the load second. This is an architectural design principle, not a fault-mode behaviour.

Under conditions where available power cannot satisfy both, the BMS automatically prioritizes Priority 1 and curtails load output. The patent describes the tertiary winding as the path through which surplus power is routed to the load. In other words, the load path receives available surplus after regime-maintenance requirements are satisfied.

VENDOR.Max is not a storage system. It is a regime-based electrodynamic power layer with no electrochemical storage and no charge/discharge cycle.

BESS stores electrical energy electrochemically and delivers it during discharge. Service life is typically 7–15 years before replacement at 70–80% residual capacity. BESS does not address grid connection queues or voltage instability at the source.

VENDOR.Max uses a regime-based electrodynamic architecture: no electrochemical cells, no charge/discharge cycling, no storage degradation curve, and no fuel logistics dependency. The two technologies serve different functions in an infrastructure power stack and are not direct substitutes.

VENDOR.Max is at TRL 5–6 — system-level validation in a controlled laboratory environment. The system is at a pre-commercial stage; no commercial deployment is currently in field.

Over 1,000 cumulative operational hours have been recorded under internal controlled testing (internal metric, not independently audited). The CE/UL certification pathway is defined, with target stage TRL 8. A first field deployment milestone is planned for Q3 2026 and remains contingent on successful completion of TRL 6 verification milestones. All performance figures cited on this site are design targets, not certified specifications.

The VENDOR.Max architecture is protected by a multi-jurisdiction patent family covering the two-contour electrodynamic configuration:

• ES2950176 — granted in Spain (OEPM), 14 March 2024
• WO2024209235 — PCT publication, all national phases complete
• EP23921569.2 — EU regional phase, examination in progress
• CN202380015725.5 — China, examination in progress
• IN202547010911 — India, examination in progress
• USA — national phase, examination in progress

There is no galvanic connection between Circuit A (regime formation) and Circuit B (extraction). The only coupling between them is electromagnetic induction through the shared magnetic field of transformer (5), which is the same physical principle that operates in every conventional transformer.

The extraction efficiency is bounded by Faraday’s law of induction, with the standard transformer relationship:

The bound η ≤ 1 holds at the extraction interface and at the device boundary. This is consistent with classical electrodynamics throughout.

At the complete device boundary, steady-state averaged efficiency does not exceed unity: η ≤ 1. This is the global conservation statement and it holds at all times. What changes between descriptions is the level of accounting, not the underlying physics.

VENDOR.Max is not a monolithic black box with a single input and a single output. It is an architecture composed of internal functional paths — regime formation, feedback, load delivery — each with its own local energy account. Two consistent accounting levels apply simultaneously:

A familiar analogy: a transformer’s secondary winding can deliver more current than its primary, while voltage drops in the same ratio. The local current ratio is greater than one, the local voltage ratio is less than one, and the device-boundary power balance remains bounded by η ≤ 1. Local ratios describe redistribution; the boundary describes conservation. The same two-level logic applies to VENDOR.Max, with the redistribution occurring across regime, feedback, and load paths rather than between primary and secondary windings.

The regime-level accounting framework, including the event-level bridge equation E_{extract,event} = E_load,event + E_fb,event + E_{loss,conv,event} and its relation to averaged power P_x,avg = E_x,event · f, is documented in full at the regime-level energy model article. The article shows how all internal accounts close back to the device-boundary balance under conservation of energy.

Electron motion in Circuit B is driven by the electromagnetic field in the shared transformer core, governed by Faraday’s law of induction. This is the same physical mechanism that operates in every conventional transformer — the difference in VENDOR.Max lies in how the field is shaped in time, not in the underlying physics.

The field is the mediator, not the source. The energy carried by the core field is the energy that Circuit A puts into it, and Circuit A draws that energy across the device boundary according to P_in,boundary = P_load + P_losses + dE/dt. What the field does is mediate and structure energy transfer across functional paths inside the device. It does not create energy and does not act as an independent energy source.

What is specific to VENDOR.Max is the regime in which the field is formed: a controlled nonlinear resonant regime at megahertz scale. The physics of induction is the same as in any transformer; the temporal structure of the field is what makes the architecture distinctive. Full mechanism details: How It Works.