Evidence Layer

Scientific Foundations of VENDOR.Max

Does understanding VENDOR.Max require new physics — or can each publicly disclosed functional block be traced to phenomena that established science already describes?

VENDOR claims a specific result and a specific publicly disclosed composition. This page does not prove that result and does not disclose the mechanism of VENDOR.Max. It shows that the physical processes and engineering classes on which the composition is built exist in mainstream science: published, reproduced by independent researchers, and still actively studied. What the reader receives here is not a proof — it is a due-diligence route.

The purpose of this page is not to ask the reader to trust our interpretation of the science. It is to make that interpretation independently auditable: every card below names its scientific territory, lists representative scientific and engineering literature from foundational work to the 2025–2026 frontier, and gives the terms to continue the search without us.

Grounding

What moves in a circuit

One piece of established physics underlies every block below. The surface charge of a circuit simultaneously maintains the potential distribution, the external field, and the organization of directed current; the quantitative treatment for elementary circuits was worked out decades ago[1][2][3]. Every block below is a different way of organizing that same motion. These results hold for circuits in general; they say nothing about any particular device.

Block map

The functional blocks, and where each one lives in science

The map below groups the publicly disclosed architecture into five scientific block families. For each: what is publicly stated, which research territory it belongs to, what the literature actually establishes, and where to continue checking.

01

Transmitting resonator

What VENDOR discloses: the transmitting resonator of VENDOR.Max is designated in the project canon as a Tesla coil — in engineering terms, a Tesla transformer (Tesla coil), an air-cored resonant transformer.

Scientific territory: coupled resonant circuits; resonant transformers; transient and resonant dynamics of Tesla transformers.

What the literature establishes: a Tesla transformer is a two-coil resonant transformer — two air-coupled resonant circuits tuned to the same frequency; complete transfer of the stored primary state into the secondary occurs at discrete values of the coupling coefficient, over a transient of several oscillation cycles. “Tesla transformer” names a physical class; it does not determine a particular electrical behavior. Modern research continues to change topology, coupling, distributed geometry, operating regime and integration in order to obtain different electrical characteristics.

Representative peer-reviewed research, from analysis to the current frontier: transient dual-resonant analysis and optimal tuning[4]; the class definition[5]; semiconductor-controlled high-test-voltage implementations[6]; spiral transformers in repetitive nanosecond pulse generators[7]; planar arc-ignition transformers in industrial power supplies[8]; segmented mutual-inductance modeling for extremely high turns ratios[9]; a 500 kV generator designed in a deliberately off-resonance operating mode[10]; and a miniaturized triple-resonant Tesla-transformer pulse generator published in 2026[11].

Continue the search: Tesla transformer · air-cored resonant transformer · dual-resonant analysis · triple-resonant Tesla transformer · IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

VENDOR does not claim the Tesla-transformer class as new. The project-specific engineering question is how the transmitting resonator is configured and coupled within the larger composition. None of these publications tests VENDOR.Max — see How It Works and Patent Portfolio.
02

Excitation and feedback path

What VENDOR discloses: VENDOR.Max is started by a brief impulse and then runs in a sustained oscillatory regime; the publicly disclosed architecture includes an excitation path with feedback associated with this operating regime.

Scientific territory: self-oscillation; feedback oscillators; regenerative circuits.

What the literature establishes: self-oscillation is an established class of dynamical systems — an active element and a feedback path maintain a durable oscillatory regime after a short initial action; the engineering lineage is documented from the 1914 patent and the 1915 IRE publication, and historians trace the continuous study of the class to the 1880s. Everyday members include the quartz timing references in watches, computers and communications equipment.

Representative scientific and engineering literature: the modern class review[12]; the foundational patent[13] and publication[14]; the peer-reviewed history of the concept[15].

Continue the search: self-oscillation · regenerative circuit · limit cycle · Physics Reports.

Historic regenerative oscillators include active elements and explicit sustaining conditions; the analogy stops at the class. Which conditions sustain the specific operating point of VENDOR.Max is established on the system itself, and none of these publications tests it — see First Open Engineering Question.
03

Charge storage and switching

What VENDOR discloses: the architecture stores separated charge and releases it in fast, controlled events; this stage prepares the excitation applied to the resonant stage.

Scientific territory: pulsed-power systems and capacitive energy storage; pulse compression and pulse forming; spark-gap, threshold and nonlinear switching.

What the literature establishes: staged restructuring of an electrical process in time — storage, nonlinear switching, time compression — is a mature repetitive engineering practice; step-up transformation is routinely used as an intermediate tool inside such chains rather than as the output; the properties of the switching event itself (rise rate, duration, repetition rate, spectrum) are treated as design variables.

Representative research and engineering literature: the systematic monograph of the field[16]; a repetitive megawatt-class module built as five stages of magnetic time compression with a step-up transformer placed between the stages[17][18]; and recent experimental work extends the same territory to sub-nanosecond pulse formation — a compact spiral generator using a sharpening spark gap produced current pulses up to 0.8 kA with rise times of ≤300 ps[19].

Continue the search: pulsed power engineering · magnetic pulse compression · pulse forming network · spark gap switching.

This card describes a class, not the node. The public description of VENDOR.Max neither names nor implies any specific medium or construction of its switching element, and none of these publications tests VENDOR.Max — see Energy Model.
04

Electromagnetic pickup

What VENDOR discloses: the pickup is galvanically separated from the resonant structures that excite it.

Scientific territory: coupled resonators; resonant inductive coupling; loaded-resonator dynamics; compensation networks; load-independent output regimes; voltage and current transformation in coupled resonant structures; resonant energy transfer and extraction under load.

What the literature establishes: strong coupling of high-Q resonant states is analyzed theoretically; transfer between physically separated resonators is an experimental result; the limits of resonant coupling — coupling coefficient, stray field, efficiency versus distance — are the subject of critical review. Beyond coupling itself, a separate engineering literature addresses how useful loaded resonant states are formed and maintained: compensation networks can bring multiple loops into simultaneous resonance, and selected operating regimes can make output voltage or current largely independent of load within a defined range. Here, “load-independent” refers to a selected output quantity; it does not mean that the load has no effect on the internal resonant state. For any particular system, the transfer rate and port voltage established under load remain system-specific measurement questions and cannot be transferred from the bibliography.

Representative peer-reviewed research: the theory of strongly coupled resonant states[20]; the direct experimental demonstration[21]; the critical review of limits[22]; a compensation network bringing three loops into simultaneous resonance[23]; and load-independent constant-voltage or constant-current output obtained through operating-frequency selection[24].

Continue the search: resonant inductive coupling · coupled resonators mode splitting · compensation network · load-independent output · wireless power transfer critical review.

These systems document the coupling class and the engineering of loaded resonant states; neither their parameters nor their topology can be transferred to VENDOR.Max by analogy, and none of these publications tests VENDOR.Max — see Where Does the Energy Come From.
05

Rectification, DC-link and regulated output

What VENDOR discloses: downstream of the pickup stand rectification, a DC link and a regulated output stage; what matches ordinary infrastructure equipment there is the output interface as a class, not the architecture and not the source.

Scientific territory: high-frequency rectification; resonant power conversion.

What the literature establishes: high-frequency rectification and resonant conversion form a subject-level engineering discipline with systematic methods of analysis and design, deployed from consumer power supplies to telecom −48 V rectifier plants.

Representative engineering literature: the standard monograph of the discipline[25].

Continue the search: resonant power converters · high-frequency rectifiers · switch-mode power supply design.

The discipline describes conversion; it does not describe any particular source, and this publication does not test VENDOR.Max — see How It Works and System Status.
The claimed cascade

From switching event to coupled resonant state

VENDOR publicly claims that after the storage-and-switching stage excites the resonant stage, a different electrical state forms on the coupled side, and the pickup operates from that state. This page does not argue that claim. It maps the scientific territory in which the claimed cascade lives: pulsed-power systems and capacitive energy storage; pulse compression and pulse forming; spark-gap, threshold and nonlinear switching; transient excitation of resonant systems; coupled resonators; Tesla transformers and their transient and resonant dynamics; voltage and current transformation in coupled resonant structures; resonant energy transfer and extraction under load. The representative literature for each part of that territory is mapped in cards 01, 03 and 04 above.

Whether the specific VENDOR cascade produces the claimed change of port state is a question the literature cannot answer in principle. It is answered only by measurement — see Technology Validation.

Verification bridge

Measurement and the boundary language

When the question changes — from how a process is organized to how much crosses a defined boundary — the language changes with it: measurement of the natural quantities of that boundary, the synchronously measured voltage and current at an electrical port. Measurable electric power quantities under sinusoidal, nonsinusoidal, balanced and unbalanced conditions are defined by the active standard IEEE Std 1459-2025[26]. Standards define how to measure; they do not establish the performance of a particular device.

The measurement discipline — see Active Power Metrology. The protocol and what has actually been demonstrated — see Technology Validation.

The boundary

Parts and composition

The literature establishes the building blocks. The engineering work is their composition. Measurement determines what the composition does.

A Rubik’s cube makes the distinction tangible: its pieces, geometry and allowed moves are all known. That knowledge still does not give you a particular configuration or the sequence of moves that produces it. The pieces of this cube are not unknown physics — each card above ends in published, reviewable science. The VENDOR-specific subject is their composition: how the blocks are connected, sequenced, and held at their operating conditions.

Established literature supports the constituent physical classes; it does not establish the behavior of their specific VENDOR composition. What that composition actually does is not established by the bibliography — that is the job of Technology Validation.

Reference layer

Research references

Every scientific statement on this page rests on the sources below. None of them evaluates VENDOR.Max — that is the point.

References
  1. Jackson J. D. Surface charges on circuit wires and resistors play three roles. American Journal of Physics 64, 855–870 (1996). DOI 10.1119/1.18112
  2. Heald M. A. Electric fields and charges in elementary circuits. American Journal of Physics 52, 522–526 (1984). DOI 10.1119/1.13611
  3. Preyer N. W. Surface charges and fields of simple circuits. American Journal of Physics 68, 1002–1006 (2000). DOI 10.1119/1.1286115
  4. Denicolai M. Optimal performance for Tesla transformers. Review of Scientific Instruments 73(9) (2002)
  5. Resonance analysis of a solid state controlled Tesla transformer. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics (2011). DOI 10.3233/JAE-2011-1327
  6. Gürleyük S. S., Taşkın H., Saraç Z. Measurement of the parameters and the resonance frequency in semiconductor controlled Tesla transformer. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 43(1), 6–10 (2012). DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.05.026
  7. Liu Y. et al. Resonant charging performance of spiral Tesla transformer applied in compact high-voltage repetitive nanosecond pulse generator. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 41(12), 3651–3658 (2013). DOI 10.1109/TPS.2013.2285782
  8. Kamath G. et al. Planar Tesla coil arc ignition transformer for a plasma cutting power supply. APEC 2012. DOI 10.1109/APEC.2012.6165945
  9. Wang S. et al. Modeling and design of the Tesla transformer with an extremely high turns ratio. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics (2025). DOI 10.1109/JESTIE.2025.3621834
  10. Appiah G. N. et al. Development of a 500 kV Tesla-transformer based pulsed generator in off-resonance mode. IEEE Pulsed Power & Plasma Science Conference (2025). DOI 10.1109/PPPS56198.2025.11248083
  11. Chen J. et al. A high-efficiency and miniaturized pulse generator based on a triple-resonant Tesla transformer. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 54(4), 1580–1590 (2026). DOI 10.1109/TPS.2026.3665587
  12. Jenkins A. Self-oscillation. Physics Reports 525(2), 167–222 (2013). DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.10.007
  13. Armstrong E. H. Wireless receiving system. US Patent 1,113,149, granted October 6, 1914
  14. Armstrong E. H. Some Recent Developments in the Audion Receiver. Proceedings of the IRE 3, 215–238 (1915); discussion follows from p. 239
  15. Ginoux J.-M., Letellier C. Van der Pol and the history of relaxation oscillations: toward the emergence of a concept. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science (2012)
  16. Mesyats G. A. Pulsed Power. Springer, 2005
  17. The repetitive high energy pulsed power module. Sandia National Laboratories, conference record (1989). OSTI 6877648
  18. Characterization of the RHEPP 1 μs magnetic pulse compression module. Sandia National Laboratories, conference record (1993). OSTI 10180181
  19. Zeltser Y., Schächter L., Krasik Y. E. Spiral Generator as a Compact Pulse Power Source for Sub-ns Pulses. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 54(2), 606–614 (2026). DOI 10.1109/TPS.2025.3648814
  20. Karalis A., Joannopoulos J. D., Soljačić M. Efficient wireless non-radiative mid-range energy transfer. Annals of Physics 323(1), 34–48 (2008). DOI 10.1016/j.aop.2007.04.017
  21. Kurs A., Karalis A., Moffatt R., Joannopoulos J. D., Fisher P., Soljačić M. Wireless power transfer via strongly coupled magnetic resonances. Science 317(5834), 83–86 (2007). DOI 10.1126/science.1143254
  22. Hui S. Y. R., Zhong W., Lee C. K. A critical review of recent progress in mid-range wireless power transfer. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 29(9), 4500–4511 (2014). DOI 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2249670
  23. Chen X., Jin X., Qi C., Mu X., Yang J. Efficiency Improvement and Harmonic Suppression of Single-Wire Power Transmission System Through Compensation Network. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics 12(2), 2345–2360 (2024). DOI 10.1109/JESTPE.2024.3363506
  24. Qi C., Yang S., Jin X., Chen X., Wang P. Frequency Selection to Achieve CV/CC Output for Single-Wire Power Transfer Systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs 71(12), 5034–5038 (2024). DOI 10.1109/TCSII.2024.3427851
  25. Kazimierczuk M. K., Czarkowski D. Resonant Power Converters, 2nd ed. Wiley-IEEE Press, 2011
  26. IEEE Std 1459-2025. IEEE Standard Definitions for the Measurement of Electric Power Quantities Under Sinusoidal, Nonsinusoidal, Balanced, or Unbalanced Conditions. IEEE, 2025
Deeper reading
  1. Galili I., Goihbarg E. Energy transfer in electrical circuits: a qualitative account. American Journal of Physics 73, 141 (2005) — the field picture of transfer in circuits
  2. Harbola M. K. Energy flow from a battery to other circuit elements: role of surface charges. American Journal of Physics 78, 1203–1206 (2010). DOI 10.1119/1.3456567 — the field picture made quantitative for an idealized circuit
  3. Nikzamir A., Capolino F. Highly sensitive coupled oscillator based on an exceptional point of degeneracy and nonlinearity. Physical Review Applied 18, 054059 (2022). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.054059 — coupled LC eigenmodes in current experiment
  4. Zhao Y. et al. Replacement of Marx generator by Tesla transformer for pulsed power system reliability improvement. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 47(1), 574–580 (2019). DOI 10.1109/TPS.2018.2873078 — Tesla transformer designed and tested within a pulsed-power architecture
  5. Gubanov V. P. et al. Periodically pulsed high voltage generator based on Tesla transformer and spiral forming line. PPPS 2001. DOI 10.1109/PPPS.2001.961021 — periodic high-voltage generation
  6. Zhao L., Li C., Su J. Fabrication of a 2.7-MV oil-immersed Tesla-transformer secondary winding. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation (2026) — winding geometry and insulation engineering as part of the attainable regime
  7. Sritakaew P., Silapunt R. Non-thermal sterilization of liquid foods via pulsed electric fields: a Tesla coil and multilevel inverter-based approach. Journal of Food Engineering 417, 113095 (2026). DOI 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2026.113095 — process-technology application