VENDOR.Max System
What the architecture is, how it is governed, and how it is measured
VENDOR.Max is a patented multi-level resonant energy architecture with separate paths for regime formation, useful-power extraction, and regime feedback, supervised by the BBMS — a distributed system for energy-state supervision and dynamic regime stability — with a native DC output and interchangeable customer interfaces. The expansion “Battery Boundary Management System” is retained as a historical explanation; it does not identify the battery as an operating energy source, and BBMS is not a conventional Battery Management System.
In engineering terms, VENDOR.Max is a governed electrodynamic and cyber-physical system. Its physical processes are classical electrodynamics. Its operating state is formed, observed, and controlled throughout operation through sensing, switching, feedback, and digital supervision.
All regime-level descriptions on this page refer to internal electrodynamics within the complete device boundary (Frame 0). They do not constitute energy-source attribution or a claim that classical conservation laws are violated.
Mechanism, accounting, and attribution are three different questions. The charge route explains how the architecture operates. The complete energy balance is closed by synchronized measurement at the complete device boundary. Attribution follows only after that balance is closed.
This page publishes the minimum architecture and measurement framework required for correct interpretation. Component timing, switching windows, control algorithms, and implementation details remain protected know-how.
Studies of the complete energy balance across all boundaries of the device have not been completed. The voltage, current, and charge series published on this page is presented for understanding the mechanism and the organization of charge motion; it is not a power specification and does not replace independent boundary metrology.
One system, two inseparable layers
VENDOR.Max cannot be described correctly by naming one component or one physical effect. It is an integrated architecture in which an electrodynamic plant and a digital supervisory layer operate as one controlled system.
Electrodynamic system
Charge separation, pulsed switching, coupled resonance, Faraday induction, rectification, power conversion, and field-mediated transfer organize the movement of charge through the architecture. Every mechanism belongs to classical electrodynamics.
Cyber-physical system
Sensors, control logic, switching, buffers, and the BBMS — a distributed supervisory layer, not a classical Battery Management System and not an energy source — couple computation to the physical regime throughout operation. The controller tracks the operating state, coordinates excitation and extraction, and keeps the regime inside its permitted dynamic envelope as the load changes.
The excitation stage of block 5 belongs to the Armstrong-type discharge-resonant oscillator class, a class known since 1912, within classical Maxwell–Lorentz electrodynamics. This classification applies to the excitation stage, not to the entire VENDOR.Max system. The architectural novelty lies in how established processes are integrated and governed.
Why the patent uses the word “Generator”
The word generator is used in the title and formal classification of the patent family because patent classification names apparatus by technical function. In the relevant pulse-circuit class, a generator is a circuit that forms electrical pulses through stored charge and controlled switching. It does not mean that VENDOR.Max is a rotating machine, and it is not a complete scientific definition of the architecture.
How the system is organized
The public architecture is described through functional levels rather than as one linear wire or one ideal transformer. Each level has its own electrical boundary, local charge carriers, and engineering role.
Startup (0) charges the startup storage and initiates control; the startup source is physically disconnected once the operating regime is established, and the startup is recorded as transferred charge Qstartup = ∫ istart dt. Pulse conversion (1) establishes the approximately 24 V operating bus at the input boundary of block 5. Block 5 (2) excites and holds a coupled high-frequency resonant regime. Secondary winding 10 and capacitor 11 (3) form the extraction node inside the boundary of block 5. Diode bridge 12 (4) is the first element outside that boundary and converts the extracted high-frequency electrical state into the DC domain. Block 13 (5) distributes power to internal services, the BBMS, thermal management, the operating-feedback line, and the customer branch; the native system output is DC, and AC is provided through a customer-interface stage.
The full level-by-level walkthrough — excitation, coupling, rectification, distribution, and control — is on the How VENDOR.Max Works page. This page holds the identity and record only.
First trace the route. Then close the balance.
The measurement issue is not the watt as a unit. The error begins when voltage and current taken at different boundaries, at different times, or without agreement on waveform and phase are multiplied and presented as one active-power value. Those quantities do not form a valid pair for one energy flow.
The 9 V startup and the customer-side output are not two quantities of the same measurement boundary, so they cannot be turned directly into a power ratio. Between them is the patent-disclosed pulse-resonant architecture in which local charge is accumulated, switched, and circulated within each electrical domain; the regime and energy are relayed between local charge ensembles through electromagnetic field coupling, while a regulated internal flow returns through a separately measured feedback line to the regime-forming input point. Coulomb accounting shows this route, but it does not replace the energy balance. The balance in joules is closed separately — by synchronized measurement of every flow on one agreed boundary.
Charge Route — read the architecture in coulombs
At each defined section, charge is measured as Q = ∫ i(t) dt. Node balances show startup, conversion, circulation, switching, extraction, distribution, and return without mixing values from unrelated boundaries. Signed transfer, mean modulus, and charge turnover are tracked separately; RMS current does not translate automatically into coulombs per second.
Energy Boundary — synchronize the energy measurements
Voltage and current are paired only at the same electrical port and over the same time base, with waveform, phase, probe delay, and uncertainty accounted for. Field, storage, thermal, and other boundary channels are inventoried by their proper methods.
Closure — close joules at Frame 0
The complete balance is evaluated at the full device boundary, covering every crossing flow and every change of internal stored energy. Only this common frame supports quantitative attribution. No possible outcome of independent closure is presumed in advance — in either direction.
This is the accounting identity for the complete device boundary (Frame 0), using one declared sign convention. It verifies whether the inventory is complete; it does not name a source by itself. Coulomb accounting does not replace joule accounting. It establishes the route first, so that the energy balance is later closed on the correct boundaries.
VENDOR.Max exists and operates. The engineering task is not to defend that fact, and it is not to negotiate with conservation laws. The task is to ensure that every instrument measures the same physical system inside one agreed frame. Trace the route in coulombs. Align the boundaries. Then close the energy balance in joules.
What is established now
Operating architecture
- System-level prototype operating under defined laboratory conditions
- More than 1,000 cumulative laboratory operating hours recorded
- Extended continuous operating cycle completed under sustained load
- Parallel and multi-module operating logic evaluated in laboratory configurations
- Timestamped internal records maintained with laboratory instrumentation
Defined next closure
- Charge-accounting register maintained at defined nodes and boundaries
- Voltage, current, and charge values attributed to their measurement points
- Complete Frame 0 protocol to be agreed with scientific supervision
- Independent competent testing organization to execute or witness the protocol
- Reproducibility recorded separately from the energy-balance result
Protected architecture
-
GrantedES2950176B2Spain · OEPM
-
PublishedWO2024209235A1PCT family anchor · WIPO
-
PendingEP4693872A1EPO regional phase
-
PendingUS20260088633A1United States · USPTO
-
PendingCN119096463AChina · CNIPA
-
PendingIN 202547010911India · national phase
Follow the architecture and the evidence
How VENDOR.Max Works
Functional levels 0–5, the operating-regime ring, secondary extraction, rectification, distribution, and output.
Read the architectureRoute, Balance, Attribution
Why the charge route is read first and why the complete energy balance is closed only at Frame 0.
Read the accounting frameworkEndurance Test Record
The internal operating record, test methodology, instrumentation, and logged laboratory conditions.
Open the recordPatent Portfolio
Patent-family documents, prosecution status, claims, and public architecture anchors.
View the portfolioTechnology Validation
Current readiness, internal evidence, independent measurement pathway, and the next engineering gates.
Open validationTechnical Data Room
Detailed technical records and protected implementation materials available through the controlled NDA review process.
Request access