R&D NOTICE: Deep-tech R&D project (TRL 5, laboratory prototype). Public information is procedural and validation-gated. Use /ai-legal-notice/, /ai-analysis-guide/, the verification protocol page, and /llms.txt as authoritative references.

Frequently Asked Questions

Clear, engineering-first answers to the questions people naturally ask

How to Think About the System

Common questions about the VENDOR.Energy™ operating principles, architecture, and engineering approach
1
Is this a perpetual motion machine?

Short answer: no.

Engineering classification:

The VENDOR system operates as an open electrodynamic system in a nonlinear resonant regime, where output behavior is defined by the formation and stabilization of a controlled operating mode.

How the system works:

Within this mode, energy:

  • is repeatedly redistributed between internal loops,
  • temporarily stored in reactive elements,
  • synchronized in phase,
  • and returned into the operating cycle through controlled recirculation.

The system's behavior is therefore governed by mode dynamics, not by linear input–output conversion.

Role of external energy:

External energy is applied to:

  • initiate the operating mode,
  • maintain its stability,
  • and compensate unavoidable losses associated with real physical components.
Correct interpretation: Because the system functions through a nonlinear resonant architecture with internal energy circulation, a direct linear comparison "input power → output power" does not describe its behavior. At the same time, the overall energy balance remains consistent with classical electrodynamics and standard conservation principles.
2
Is this free energy?
Correct framing:

VENDOR.Energy™ is an open electrodynamic energy system operating in a nonlinear resonant regime, where external control is used to establish and stabilize the operating mode.

What "free energy" usually implies — and why this framing is inaccurate here:

In public discourse, the term free energy is commonly used as a shorthand for either:

  • energy obtained without any external input, or
  • energy produced without cost, infrastructure, or ongoing effort.

VENDOR.Energy™ is described differently.

The system requires engineered hardware, controlled architecture, manufacturing, maintenance, and operational oversight. Energy output is achieved through technology, design, and controlled operating conditions, not through the absence of inputs or costs.

How this system should be understood in practice:

VENDOR.Energy™ represents an engineering approach to energy generation based on controlled operating modes, where:

  • external energy is used to initiate and maintain the mode,
  • energy is redistributed and recirculated within the system,
  • output power is determined by the operating regime rather than by the concept of "free" energy.
3
Is there a hidden battery inside?
How the system is actually designed:

VENDOR.Energy™ includes a small battery, but it is used as a protection and stabilization component, not as an energy source for the load.

Why it is needed — in plain terms:

Any power system is sensitive to sudden peak loads. A simple everyday example is turning on an air conditioner, a compressor, or an electric motor. At startup, these devices draw a short but very high current spike.

If such peaks are not managed, they can:

  • disrupt the operating mode,
  • cause the generator to stall,
  • or lead to unstable system behavior.

This is exactly why VENDOR.Energy™ incorporates a Battery Management System (BMS) together with a small battery.

The role of the battery:

The battery:

  • absorbs short-term peak loads,
  • protects the active generation mode from sudden current spikes,
  • allows the system to pass heavy load startups smoothly.

It does not continuously power the load and does not define how long the system can operate.

The Key Distinction

In conventional systems, a battery is an energy source. In VENDOR.Energy™, the battery acts as a mode damper and safety buffer — similar to a shock absorber in a car suspension. The car can move without it, but the shock absorber protects the system from impacts and loss of stability.

How autonomy should be understood: System operation is determined by the stability of the generation mode, not by the battery capacity. Without an active operating mode, output power is not sustained, regardless of the battery's state.
4
Where does energy come from in the "right block"?
VENDOR Architecture Analogy
Correct engineering classification:

The right-hand section of VENDOR.Energy™ is a transformer reactor-mixer — a functional unit in which the system's electrodynamic operating mode is formed and maintained.

What "reactor-mixer" means in simple terms:

This block:

  • is not an energy source,
  • does not store energy like a battery,
  • and does not function as a linear power converter.

Its purpose is to create the conditions in which energy:

  • is redistributed across system elements,
  • accumulates within reactive loops,
  • and returns into the overall cycle in a coordinated form.

The term reactor is used because an active process takes place inside, rather than passive power transfer. The term mixer reflects the way electric fields, impulses, and internal processes are combined into a single stable operating mode.

Why the question "where does the energy come from" feels natural, but is misleading:

In linear systems, energy is always expected to "come from" a specific source. Within the reactor-mixer, a mode is formed in which system energy behaves differently:

  • it does not appear spontaneously,
  • it becomes effective through architecture and operating conditions.
The role of external energy:

External energy is applied to:

  • initiate the reactor-mixer,
  • bring the system into its operating mode,
  • and maintain regime stability.
5
If there is amplification, what exactly is being amplified?
Correct engineering framing:

In VENDOR.Energy™, what is amplified is not energy itself, but the operating mode of the system — the state that makes stable and effective operation possible in the first place.

An Analogy That Captures the Meaning Precisely

When an aircraft climbs to altitude, the outside pressure becomes incompatible with human life. For passengers and crew to breathe, think, and function, the cabin maintains a specific pressure regime.

What matters here:

  • the aircraft does not create air "from nothing,"
  • it does not increase the amount of oxygen in the world,
  • it maintains conditions without which normal operation is impossible.

If that regime is lost, people lose the ability to function, even though air physically still exists around them.

The same principle applies to VENDOR.Energy™.

What is actually amplified inside the system:

Within the transformer reactor-mixer, a regime is established in which:

  • electric fields become coordinated,
  • oscillatory processes enter stable synchronization,
  • energy is retained within the architecture for longer periods,
  • and the system transitions into a state suitable for useful work.

What increases is not the amount of energy, but the system's ability to organize and utilize energy effectively.

Why this appears as power amplification:

Because:

  • the system no longer "chokes" under load,
  • losses are reduced,
  • internal recirculation becomes stable,
  • and output power manifests precisely because the operating mode is sustained.
As with aircraft cabin pressure: no new energy appears, but without the correct operating regime, functional operation is impossible.
6
Does avalanche behavior mean instability or explosion risk?
Correct engineering classification:

In VENDOR.Energy™, avalanche behavior is used as a localized and controlled physical mechanism, embedded into the operating architecture, rather than as an uncontrolled growth process.

Why this concern naturally arises:

In popular explanations, avalanche effects are often described as processes where quantities "multiply geometrically." Taken at face value, this leads to a reasonable fear: If growth is exponential, why wouldn't the system run out of control or fail catastrophically?

What actually matters in engineered systems:

In practical engineering, avalanche behavior:

  • is bounded by physical conditions,
  • operates within a narrow parameter window,
  • and exists only while the operating mode is actively maintained.

Within VENDOR.Energy™, avalanche processes:

  • do not develop spontaneously,
  • do not accumulate indefinitely,
  • and do not transition into runaway states.
How stability is ensured:

The system architecture is designed so that:

  • the operating mode forms around defined thresholds,
  • deviations automatically reduce process intensity,
  • the system exits the mode when conditions are no longer met.

In simple terms, the avalanche effect here functions as a working zone, not as a chain reaction.

Why an explosion scenario is physically excluded: Because energy is not concentrated in a single volume, processes are distributed across the architecture, and the system is engineered to leave the operating mode long before unsafe conditions can arise.
7
Do inductive elements create massive interference?
Correct engineering framing:

In VENDOR.Energy™, inductive elements are part of a deliberately engineered electromagnetic architecture, not a byproduct that generates uncontrolled interference.

Why this concern is common:

In conventional systems, inductance is often associated with:

  • parasitic harmonics,
  • electromagnetic noise,
  • interference affecting nearby equipment.

That experience is understandable — it comes from linear circuits where inductive effects appear as unwanted side effects.

How this architecture differs:

In VENDOR.Energy™, the oscillation spectrum is:

  • intentionally formed,
  • structured,
  • and integrated into the operating mode itself.

In other words, what is typically treated as "noise" in standard systems is used here as a controlled component of the operating regime, not as a random artifact.

Why this does not turn into uncontrolled interference:

Because:

  • the processes occur within a defined architecture,
  • frequency components are coupled to the operating mode,
  • and the system is designed with electromagnetic compatibility in mind.
External electromagnetic impact is handled within standard EMC requirements, as expected from any mature power system.
8
What about electrode degradation from plasma and component lifetime?
Correct engineering framing:

In VENDOR.Energy™, electrode degradation and component lifetime are treated as defined and controllable engineering parameters, not as side effects or unpredictable failure modes.

Why degradation occurs at all:

Any plasma or discharge-based process involves:

  • localized electrical stress,
  • interaction of ions and electrons with material surfaces,
  • gradual material wear over time.
How this is addressed in VENDOR.Energy™:

The architecture employs a distributed, multi-module electrode system, where:

  • the discharge is not confined to a single volume,
  • electrodes operate in different modes and frequency ranges,
  • electrical stress is distributed across space and time.

As a result:

  • local erosion is reduced,
  • degradation becomes uniform and predictable,
  • accelerated wear of individual components is avoided.
What this means in operation:

The system is designed with the understanding that:

  • active discharge components have a finite service life,
  • that lifetime must be measurable and predictable,
  • and maintenance must be simple and economically reasonable.

For this reason, the discharge assembly is implemented as a replaceable module, following the logic of a consumable component — similar to a filter in industrial equipment.

Service life and maintenance model: At the current stage, the system includes scheduled maintenance approximately once per year, planned replacement of the discharge module, with an estimated service cost on the order of tens of euros, without the need for major system overhaul.

Key point: VENDOR.Energy™ does not claim "eternal electrodes." Instead, it applies a practical engineering approach to component lifetime, operating regime control, and maintenance — consistent with established industrial and energy systems.

9
Does this violate the law of conservation of energy?

Let's start with a simple and widely accepted analogy.

A Real-World Energy Analogy: A Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP)

Consider a hydroelectric power plant — something almost everyone is familiar with, even though very few people realize the actual scale of the generators inside.

Inside the powerhouse, there is a synchronous generator whose rotor:

  • weighs tens, sometimes hundreds of tons,
  • rotates in strict synchrony with the grid frequency,
  • and, once in operation, possesses enormous rotational inertia.

When such a generator has entered its operating mode:

  • maintaining rotation and synchronization requires relatively little control power;
  • yet at the same time, the generator:
    • powers cities,
    • delivers megawatts of electricity,
    • supports the load of entire regions.

Now comes the crucial point: Try stopping it.

You cannot simply "turn off" a hydroelectric generator:

  • it cannot be stopped instantly,
  • its rotational inertia is massive,
  • sudden loss of synchronization is an emergency, not normal operation.

To stop it, accelerate it, or bring it back into synchronization requires time, procedures, and energy.

And this is: official, mainstream power engineering, described in textbooks, governed by hydropower operating standards — not an exotic or fringe theory.

How this relates to VENDOR.Energy™

VENDOR.Energy™ follows the same physical logic, implemented in a different architecture.

The system establishes an operating mode. Maintaining this mode requires relatively little energy.

But the mode itself can be powerful:

  • it can supply loads,
  • drive devices,
  • generate heat, light, and useful work.

This is not a contradiction and not a trick. It is a nonlinear system, not a simple linear "input equals output" model.

Why linear thinking does not apply here

In everyday intuition, we tend to think: the more energy you feed in, the more you get out (minus losses).

In this architecture:

  • energy is retained within the operating mode,
  • it circulates inside the system,
  • and it is extracted inductively, without rigid electrical coupling.

A relatively small amount of energy sustains the mode. The mode, in turn, enables the system to handle much larger energy flows.

Why this does not violate the law of conservation of energy: Because energy is not created, energy does not disappear, energy is organized and utilized differently. The law of physics does not change. What changes is the architecture of how energy exists and is used inside the system.
The key takeaway

A mode can be powerful. Maintaining a mode does not necessarily require large energy input.

This is how:

  • hydroelectric generators operate,
  • synchronous machines function in power grids,
  • resonant engineering systems behave,

and this is exactly the logic behind VENDOR.Energy™.

10
Why is it called a generator if the patent mentions transformation?

Let's start with the most important point — language.

The words "generator" and "transformation" describe different layers of the same process, not a contradiction.

What "transformation" means in the patent context:

In patent and engineering terminology, transformation is used to describe:

  • a change in the form of energy,
  • a change in operating regime,
  • a change in how energy interacts with the system.

This is a precise technical description of what happens inside the architecture.

Why the term "generator" is used publicly:

In practical terms, a generator is a device that:

  • creates a usable operating energy mode,
  • is capable of performing useful work,
  • and can sustain an external load.

That is exactly what VENDOR.Energy™ does: it forms and maintains an operating mode in which energy becomes available for real-world use.

A Simple Analogy

Take a conventional electrical generator.

From an engineering perspective, it:

  • transforms mechanical rotational energy,
  • into an electromagnetic operating regime,
  • suitable for powering a grid.

Yet in everyday language, nobody calls it "a mechanical-to-electromagnetic energy transformer."

Everyone calls it a generator.

Why? Because it creates a functional energy state, rather than merely "moving" energy from one place to another.

How this applies to VENDOR.Energy™

Within the system:

  • the internal architecture indeed performs complex transformations of processes and regimes,
  • but the outcome is a stable generator mode,
  • capable of supplying external loads.

That is why:

  • the patent uses precise engineering language,
  • while public descriptions use the functional term "generator."

They describe the same system from two complementary perspectives:

  • the patent explains how it works,
  • the term "generator" explains what it does.
The key takeaway: Transformation describes the process. Generation describes the function. That is why the term "generator" is appropriate here, even though the patent carefully details the transformation of energy and operating regimes.
★
Why does it appear that the system delivers more power than is required to sustain its operation?
Why this question arises:

This question typically appears last — after it becomes clear that:

  • the system is not a perpetual motion machine,
  • it is not “free energy”,
  • there is no hidden power source inside,
  • and the law of energy conservation is not violated.

Yet a residual intuition remains: why does the power delivered to the load appear significantly larger than the energy required to keep the system operating?

Correct engineering framing:

This effect does not originate from physics, but from an incorrect choice of model and system boundaries.

Most conventional energy systems are interpreted through a linear assumption: input power directly determines output power. That assumption does not apply to the VENDOR.Energy™ architecture.

The system consists of two functionally separated contours:

  • a nonlinear regime-formation contour, where the operating mode is created and stabilized,
  • a linear power-extraction contour, through which useful power is delivered to the load.

The energy required to maintain the operating regime is not the same as the energy delivered to the load. When these two processes are incorrectly merged into a single linear calculation, an apparent paradox emerges.

Important: this is not a physical paradox and not an exception to conservation laws, but a consequence of an incorrect system-boundary definition.
Why there is no short answer here:

A correct explanation requires a strict separation of:

  • system boundaries,
  • loss-compensation channels,
  • and power-extraction mechanisms.

In a short FAQ format, such separation inevitably leads to oversimplification.

For a rigorous technical explanation: the full mathematical and physical analysis — including why an apparent “efficiency >100%” is a boundary-definition error rather than a physics violation — is presented in the dedicated article:

Regime-Based Electrodynamic Systems as an Alternative to Linear Energy Models: Scientific Foundation of VENDOR.Energy™ Architecture

Verification & Disclosure FAQ

Block A — Classification

Classification and technical framework questions about VENDOR.Energy™
1
What class of system is VENDOR?
Concise classification:

VENDOR.Energy™ belongs to the class of open electrodynamic energy systems operating in a nonlinear resonant regime, where system behavior is defined by the formation and stabilization of a controlled operating mode.

Key class characteristics:
  • the system is open (exchanges energy with external circuits);
  • behavior is governed by the operating mode, not linear conversion;
  • a resonant and recirculating architecture is employed;
  • energy extraction occurs through a separated linear output loop.
Important: VENDOR.Energy™ does not fall under chemical energy sources, battery-based systems, or closed linear input–output converters.
2
Is air a source of energy in this system?

Short answer: No. In VENDOR.Energy™, air is not a source of energy.

Correct framing:

In this architecture, air functions as a working medium and a coupling environment, not as an energy source.

Classification-level clarification:
  • energy is not "extracted from air";
  • air is not treated as fuel or a resource;
  • its role is to participate in the formation and stabilization of the system's operating mode.
Important: Using an environment as a medium for coupling, transfer, or stabilization of processes does not imply that the medium itself is an energy source.
3
Why are public performance claims avoided?
Short reason:

Public performance claims in VENDOR.Energy™ are limited due to certification-gated disclosure requirements.

Correct framing:

Performance metrics such as power output, efficiency, and operating limits are disclosed progressively, in alignment with:

  • the current validation level (TRL),
  • certification and testing requirements,
  • and applicable legal and liability frameworks.
Classification-level clarification:
  • prior to independent testing and certification, any public figures are considered preliminary;
  • premature disclosure creates regulatory and legal risks;
  • therefore, data release is tied to formal verification milestones.
Important: The absence of public performance claims reflects procedural discipline, not a lack of measurements or results.

Block B — Validation

Validation and testing methodology questions about VENDOR.Energy™
4
What is currently being validated (TRL framing)?
Current validation focus:

In VENDOR.Energy™, the current validation effort is focused on the existence, stability, and reproducibility of the system's operating mode, rather than on commercial performance metrics.

What is being validated within the TRL framework:
  • formation and stability of the operating mode;
  • controllability of the mode under varying loads;
  • reproducibility of system behavior;
  • compliance of energy balance measurements with the defined methodology.
What is deliberately not subject to public validation at this stage:
  • peak or limit power claims;
  • commercial operating parameters;
  • comparative performance statements.
Important: At this TRL stage, validation is aimed at physical correctness, controllability, and repeatability, forming the foundation for subsequent certification and scaling phases.
5
What does "independent validation" mean in your process?
Concise definition:

In VENDOR.Energy™, independent validation means system testing and assessment performed by third parties that are not involved in the development, financing, or commercial promotion of the technology.

What this means in practice:
  • measurements and tests are conducted outside the development team;
  • predefined and documented measurement protocols are used;
  • results are recorded and interpreted by independent specialists or organizations;
  • the developer does not control the measurement process and does not influence the outcomes.
Who may act as an independent party:

Depending on the stage and scope, this may include:

  • accredited testing laboratories;
  • independent engineering auditors;
  • international certification and verification organizations (for example, entities operating at the level of TÜV, DNV, Intertek, UL, within appropriate procedures).
What does not qualify as independent validation:
  • internal team testing;
  • demonstrations without a formal measurement protocol;
  • claims based solely on internal calculations or models.
Important: Within the VENDOR.Energy™ process, independent validation is treated as a mandatory intermediate step between TRL confirmation of the operating mode and subsequent certification stages.
6
What constitutes a verification-grade test protocol?
Concise definition:

A verification-grade test protocol is a formalized and reproducible testing procedure that is sufficient for independent verification of system behavior and energy balance.

Key requirements of such a protocol:
  • a predefined and documented measurement methodology;
  • clearly defined system boundaries and measurement points;
  • use of calibrated measurement equipment;
  • full reproducibility of the test by a third party;
  • documentation of test conditions, tolerances, and measurement uncertainties.
What is being verified:
  • stability and reproducibility of the operating mode;
  • correctness of the energy balance within defined boundaries;
  • absence of hidden external energy inputs;
  • consistency of results across repeated test runs.
What does not qualify as a verification-grade protocol:
  • demonstrations without a complete methodology;
  • tests without full accounting of all inputs and outputs;
  • measurements that cannot be independently reproduced.
Important: In VENDOR.Energy™, verification-grade protocols are treated as a prerequisite for independent validation and subsequent certification, not as a marketing instrument.

Block C — Architecture

Architecture and engineering design questions about VENDOR.Energy™
7
What is the two-loop architecture (Active Core / Linear Extraction)?
Concise definition:

VENDOR.Energy™ employs a two-loop architecture in which the functions of operating mode formation and energy extraction are physically and functionally separated.

Active Core:
  • responsible for forming and sustaining the operating mode;
  • operates in a nonlinear electrodynamic regime;
  • not intended for direct load connection.
Linear Extraction:
  • dedicated to energy extraction;
  • operates in a linear, standard engineering domain;
  • ensures compatibility with external loads and systems.
Key principle:

The operating mode is formed within the Active Core, while useful energy is extracted through Linear Extraction, without direct rigid interference with the active regime.

Important: Loop separation is an architectural design choice aimed at stability, controllability, and proper system validation.
8
What is the role of the buffer and BMS layer? Can the system operate without them?
Concise definition:

In VENDOR.Energy™, the buffer and BMS (Battery Management System) layer are designed to stabilize and protect the operating mode, not to generate energy or continuously supply the load.

Primary functions of the buffer and BMS:
  • smoothing short-term transient processes;
  • compensating peak loads during load connection or load changes;
  • preventing disruption or degradation of the operating mode;
  • ensuring controlled system behavior under non-steady conditions.
Can the system operate without a battery and BMS?

Yes — under specific conditions.

The generator cannot enter its operating mode without an initial start impulse. However, once the operating mode has been formed and stabilized:

  • if the load is constant and predictable;
  • if there are no sharp peak currents or sudden load spikes;
  • if operation remains within defined regime limits,

the system can operate stably without a battery and BMS, relying solely on the sustained operating mode initiated by the start impulse.

Limitation:

In this configuration, continuous operation is limited by:

  • component service life,
  • material degradation,
  • operating conditions,

rather than by the presence or capacity of a battery.

Important: The buffer and BMS are not strictly required for the physical existence of the operating mode, but they represent an engineering optimization that significantly improves stability, robustness, and operational safety in real-world load scenarios.
9
Why is the term "mode generator" used in the patent context?
Concise reason:

The term "mode generator" is used in the patent to accurately describe the functional role of the system, not to denote an energy source.

Correct patent-level meaning:

In the context of VENDOR.Energy™, a "mode generator" refers to a system that:

  • establishes a specific operating mode;
  • brings the system into that state;
  • maintains the mode within defined boundaries.

The term describes the generation of an operating regime, not the creation of energy in a conventional sense.

Why the simplified term "transformer" is insufficient:
  • a transformer describes linear conversion;
  • the VENDOR.Energy™ architecture involves nonlinear mode formation;
  • the key outcome is not conversion, but the establishment of a stable system state.
Important: Patent terminology is intentionally precise and functional. It describes what the system creates (an operating mode), rather than a simplified end-use description.

Block D — Safety & Compliance

Safety, compliance, and deployment questions about VENDOR.Energy™
10
What safety framework governs development?

Short answer: VENDOR.Energy™ is developed under a certification-first approach, where safety requirements are defined before scaling and commercialization.

What this means in practice:
  • the architecture is designed with future certification requirements in mind;
  • operating regimes are constrained within predefined safety boundaries;
  • electrical, thermal, and electromagnetic factors are addressed from the outset;
  • priority is given to controllability, predictability, and fail-safe behavior.
Regulatory alignment:

The development process is aligned with the logic and requirements applied in:

  • international electrical safety standards;
  • CE / IEC / ISO certification pathways (as applicable);
  • independent engineering audit practices.
Important: Safety is treated as a core architectural parameter, not as an add-on or a post-development consideration.
11
How are emissions, ozone, and byproducts treated?

Short answer: In VENDOR.Energy™, potential emissions, ozone formation, and byproducts are assessed under controlled conditions, in alignment with safety and certification requirements.

Assessment approach:
  • evaluation is performed during development and operating-mode validation;
  • electrical, chemical, and electromagnetic factors are taken into account;
  • measurements are conducted within formalized testing protocols.
Regulatory logic:

Any potential byproducts are evaluated in the context of:

  • applicable safety standards,
  • occupational health and environmental requirements,
  • certification and compliance procedures.
Important: The assessment of emissions and byproducts is treated as an integral part of the overall validation and compliance process, not as a separate or secondary consideration.
12
Who is the system intended for today?

Short answer: At the current stage, VENDOR.Energy™ is not intended for the mass consumer market.

Current intended use:
  • engineering and research pilots;
  • institutional and industrial partners;
  • deployments under controlled operating conditions;
  • validation, certification, and technical evaluation processes.
What this means in practice:
  • the system is used in limited and supervised scenarios;
  • deployment is governed by technical and regulatory frameworks;
  • the focus is on correctness, safety, and reproducibility, not on volume sales.
Important: Broader market availability is considered only after completion of the relevant validation and certification stages.

Block E — Access & Disclosure

Documentation access and disclosure policy questions about VENDOR.Energy™
13
Where can partners review full technical materials?

Short answer: Full technical documentation for VENDOR.Energy™ is disclosed only at the TRL-8 verification stage.

How disclosure is structured:
  • prior to reaching TRL-8, full technical materials are not made available;
  • at earlier stages, only limited overview and classification-level materials are provided;
  • detailed technical documentation is disclosed exclusively as part of a formal verification process.
Access format at TRL-8:
  • access is provided through the restricted Silent Pitch Room;
  • only after preliminary review and agreement on access conditions;
  • within a controlled scope aligned with verification objectives and compliance requirements.
What this means:
  • intellectual property is protected until a critical validation milestone is reached;
  • premature or uncontrolled dissemination of sensitive technical data is avoided;
  • disclosure is synchronized with regulatory and certification logic.
Important: Restricted access to full technical documentation is an intentional disclosure policy, designed to protect IP, ensure verification integrity, and maintain legal clarity.
14
Why are some parameters not public?

Short answer: Some VENDOR.Energy™ parameters are not publicly disclosed because their release is tied to verification stages, certification requirements, and intellectual property protection.

Key reasons for limited disclosure:
  • certain parameters are meaningful only within formal measurement and test protocols;
  • premature publication may lead to misinterpretation or misuse;
  • some data is IP-sensitive and relates to architectural design choices;
  • specific parameters are disclosed only after independent verification.
Procedural logic:
  • prior to reaching the relevant TRL, only classification- and architecture-level information is made public;
  • numerical and operational parameters are released progressively, synchronized with verification milestones;
  • public disclosure does not precede legal and certification readiness.
Important: Restricted disclosure of parameters is an intentional and standard practice for deep-tech systems under validation and does not imply a lack of measurements or data.

Corporate Origin & Obligations

Corporate structure and financial transparency questions about VENDOR.Energy™
15
Is VENDOR.Energy™ a spin-off project?

Short answer: No. VENDOR.Energy™ is not, and has never been, a spin-off project.

Correct clarification:
  • the technology is a proprietary development carried out over more than 14 years;
  • the project did not originate from universities, government programs, or corporate R&D initiatives;
  • none of the developers have worked in governmental or quasi-governmental organizations where such technology could have been developed;
  • all research, prototyping, and development were conducted exclusively using the founders' own resources.
Important: VENDOR.Energy™ has no institutional "parent" project and does not inherit technology from any third party.
16
What liabilities or obligations does the project have?

Short answer: VENDOR.Energy™ has no external debt obligations to third-party creditors.

Correct interpretation of public financial records:

In official registries, certain liabilities may appear. These reflect standard internal and operational financing mechanisms, including:

  • founder-provided funding (shareholder loans / creditare firmă);
  • routine operational commitments associated with company activity.
Funds are used for:
  • ongoing operations;
  • office and facility costs;
  • employee compensation;
  • accounting, legal, and administrative services;
  • standard operational assets acquired under commercial leasing or service agreements, as commonly used by companies operating in Romania and the EU.
Key point:

All recorded financial obligations are internal to the company structure or related to ordinary operational arrangements. There are no liabilities to banks, government institutions, or external financial creditors.

Important: This financing structure represents standard early-stage deep-tech practice, where founders support operations directly during validation and certification phases. It does not constitute external debt exposure or financial risk to partners or investors.