Authors: O.Krishevich, V.Peretyachenko

Abstract

The question “Where does the energy come from?” is often used as a final objection to nonlinear systems. In practice, it most commonly indicates not a violation of physical laws, but an incorrect definition of system boundaries and the application of linear intuition to regimes dominated by nonlinearity, field-mediated interactions, and resonant phenomena.

Key conclusions:

• the choice of system boundaries is critical;
• open nonlinear systems far from equilibrium remain fully consistent with thermodynamics;
• energy cascades and resonant transfers constitute fundamental mechanisms;
• experimental reproducibility is a primary criterion of validity.

This article is a review and is grounded in published experimental results from peer-reviewed sources.

Keywords: open systems, nonlinear dynamics, energy balance, dissipative structures, resonant interactions

Introduction

The question “Where does the energy come from?” frequently appears as a final argument in discussions of nonlinear systems. In practice, it almost always points not to a breach of physical laws, but to improperly chosen system boundaries and an oversimplified (linear) model applied to regimes in which nonlinearity, field interactions, and resonant phenomena dominate.

In such problems, thermodynamics is neither “canceled” nor “rewritten”; rather, it requires a careful definition of the system, accounting for all exchange channels, and a correct description of far-from-equilibrium regimes.

Historically, engineering reasoning developed within the paradigm of linear systems with clearly defined energy inputs and outputs. When one moves to systems exhibiting nonlinear behavior, field-mediated interactions, and resonant effects, the correct use of thermodynamics does not require revising its principles. Instead, it requires expanding the boundaries of the analyzed system and explicitly accounting for all relevant degrees of freedom.

The purpose of this article is not to claim the existence of “new energy sources,” but to eliminate a categorical error: analyzing open nonlinear systems as if they were closed and linear. Under such assumptions, the “energy paradox” is often an artifact of incorrectly defined boundaries, incomplete accounting of field-mediated channels, and neglect of the regimes (modes / regimes) through which energy is redistributed and dissipated.

1. System Definition as a Fundamental Problem

1.1 Isolated, Closed, and Open Systems: A Formal Distinction

The first and most critical error in the analysis of nonlinear systems is an incorrect choice of system boundaries. In formal thermodynamics, three types of systems are distinguished:

• Isolated system — exchanges neither mass nor energy with its surroundings
• Closed system — exchanges energy (as heat and work) but not mass
• Open system — exchanges both energy and mass with its surroundings

For an isolated system, the second law of thermodynamics states that entropy does not decrease:

\[ \frac{dS_{\text{iso}}}{dt} \ge 0 \]

This is a fundamental statement for any spontaneous process in a system not interacting with the external world.

Living organisms, lasers, plasma systems, and most engineered devices are open systems. For an open system in contact with its surroundings at fixed temperature \(T\) and pressure \(P\) (and, in the appropriate formulation, fixed chemical potentials), practical criteria of stability and spontaneity are often expressed in terms of free energies—Gibbs free energy \(G\) or Helmholtz free energy \(F\):

\[ G = H – TS, \qquad F = U – TS \]

At fixed \(T\) and \(P\), the system tends toward minimizing the Gibbs free energy:

\[ \Delta G = \Delta H – T \Delta S \rightarrow \min \]

This implies that a local decrease of entropy within the system (e.g., the synthesis of ordered biopolymers or the formation of coherent laser radiation) does not contradict the second law. The key point is that the total entropy of “system + environment” increases.

1.2 System Boundaries and Nonlinear Interactions

In nonlinear systems, the system boundary becomes an active analytical instrument. Consider the classical example of a laser.

A naive approach treats the laser as a device with an input (electric current or optical pumping) and an output (a light beam), while everything else is interpreted as losses. However, such a boundary choice neglects essential components of the system:

• the active medium with quantized energy levels;
• the optical resonator and its eigenmodes;
• the electromagnetic field in the cavity;
• the process of stimulated emission.

A correct analysis includes all these elements within the system boundary. Under such a definition, it becomes clear that energy is not “created from nothing”: it is transferred from the pump into a population inversion and then into coherent photons through resonant interaction.

Energy is fully accounted for; however, its distribution across degrees of freedom is nonlinear and depends on the operating regime.

2. Theory of Open Systems Far from Equilibrium

2.1 Dissipative Structures and Nonequilibrium Organization

In 1977, the physical chemist Ilya Prigogine received the Nobel Prize for developing the thermodynamics of irreversible processes far from equilibrium. His key insight was that, in open systems operating far from equilibrium, irreversible processes (dissipation) can serve as a source of order, not only disorder.

With a sufficiently strong energy flux and displacement beyond a critical distance from equilibrium, a system can spontaneously organize into new structured states—dissipative structures—characterized by:

• coherent collective behavior of many components;
• maintenance by a continuous flow of energy through the system;
• emergence of new regimes (temporal oscillations, spatial patterns, chaotic dynamics);
• onset at critical parameter values (bifurcations).

A classical example is the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction, which exhibits stable periodic concentration oscillations in an open chemical system. These oscillations are fully consistent with the second law of thermodynamics: the total entropy of the system plus the environment increases, because chemical free energy is irreversibly converted into heat.

Order emerges not despite dissipation, but through its structured nonequilibrium character.

2.2 Energy Balance in Open Systems

For an open system exchanging mass and energy with its surroundings, the first law of thermodynamics in differential form can be written as:

\[ \frac{dU_{CV}}{dt} + \sum_{\text{out}} \dot{m}_{\text{out}} \left( h + \frac{u^2}{2} + gz \right) – \sum_{\text{in}} \dot{m}_{\text{in}} \left( h + \frac{u^2}{2} + gz \right) = \dot{Q} + \dot{W} \]

where \(U_{CV}\) is the internal energy of the control volume, \(h\) is the specific enthalpy, \(\dot{m}\) is the mass flow rate, \(\dot{Q}\) is the heat transfer rate, and \(\dot{W}\) is the mechanical work rate.

In steady state, \(\frac{dU_{CV}}{dt} = 0\), and the energy balance simplifies: the total incoming energy equals the outgoing energy plus heat exchange.

In nonlinear systems, this formally simple balance can mask redistribution of energy among oscillatory modes, field variables, and resonant states. Nevertheless, a detailed accounting of all relevant degrees of freedom typically shows that energy conservation holds correctly—energy is simply distributed in ways that a linear model would not predict.

3. Energy Cascades and Cross-Scale Energy Transfer

3.1 Turbulence and the Kolmogorov Spectrum

Turbulence provides a canonical example of nonlinear energy transfer across scales without violating energy conservation.

In fully developed turbulence, energy is injected at large scales and is successively transferred to smaller scales through a cascade of interacting eddies until it reaches the Kolmogorov (dissipative) scale:

\[ \eta = \left( \frac{\nu^3}{\varepsilon} \right)^{1/4} \]

where \(\nu\) is the kinematic viscosity and \(\varepsilon\) is the mean rate of energy dissipation per unit mass.

Within the inertial subrange, the energy spectrum follows the universal Kolmogorov scaling:

\[ E(k) \sim \varepsilon^{2/3} k^{-5/3} \]

Experimental validation of the Kolmogorov spectrum in atmospheric flows, laboratory experiments, and numerical simulations demonstrates that energy does not vanish as it moves across scales. Instead, it is redistributed through nonlinear interactions among modes.

4. Plasma and Magnetic Reconnection: Conversion of Field Energy

4.1 Magnetic Energy in Plasma: Mechanisms of Rapid Energy Release

Magnetic reconnection is a fundamental process in plasma physics through which magnetic field energy is rapidly converted into kinetic energy and thermal energy of charged particles. This process occurs in solar flares, geomagnetic substorms, astrophysical plasmas, and in laboratory devices for controlled nuclear fusion.

The basic mechanism involves the approach of magnetic field lines with opposite directions. Under suitable plasma conditions, these field lines break and reconnect. The newly reconnected field lines are strongly curved; as they relax toward a lower-energy configuration, the stored magnetic energy is released into the surrounding plasma.

This released energy is partitioned into several channels:

• kinetic energy of bulk plasma flows;
• thermal energy of electrons and ions;
• direct acceleration of charged particles by electric fields.

From a thermodynamic perspective, magnetic reconnection does not generate energy. Rather, it enables a rapid and nonlinear transformation of energy already stored in the electromagnetic field into particle degrees of freedom. The total energy budget remains conserved when the magnetic field is properly included within the system boundaries.

4.2 Electron Acceleration by Parallel Electric Fields

Recent experimental and observational studies have clarified the microphysical mechanisms responsible for particle energization during reconnection. In particular, measurements in the Earth’s magnetotail demonstrate the critical role of electric fields parallel to the magnetic field (\(E_{\parallel}\)).

Electrons interacting with these fields can gain significant energy over short spatial and temporal scales, leading to rapid heating and nonthermal distributions. Observed temperature increases by one to two orders of magnitude are consistent with kinetic theory and with detailed energy balance calculations.

Importantly, these processes do not violate conservation laws. They illustrate that electromagnetic fields constitute real energy reservoirs, and that nonlinear plasma dynamics provides efficient pathways for transferring energy from fields to particles.

5. Lasers and Nonlinear Resonant Interactions

5.1 Classical and Nonlinear Optical Regimes

Lasers represent a well-controlled and extensively studied platform for analyzing nonlinear energy conversion mediated by resonant interactions.

In a classical laser, external energy supplied to the active medium (electrical current or optical pumping) excites atoms or molecules to higher energy levels. When a population inversion is established, spontaneous emission can trigger stimulated emission, resulting in coherent radiation.

At sufficiently high field intensities—when the electric field amplitude becomes comparable to intra-atomic fields—qualitatively new nonlinear phenomena emerge. These include harmonic generation, parametric amplification, and multi-wave mixing processes.

5.2 Parametric Conversion and Multimode Energy Transfer

In a parametric oscillator, a pump photon of frequency \(\omega_p\) is converted into two lower-frequency photons, commonly referred to as signal (\(\omega_s\)) and idler (\(\omega_i\)):

\[ \omega_p = \omega_s + \omega_i \]

In addition to energy conservation, momentum conservation (phase matching) must also be satisfied:

\[ \vec{k}_p = \vec{k}_s + \vec{k}_i \]

When these resonance conditions are met, energy is efficiently redistributed between optical modes. The total energy remains conserved; the nonlinear interaction determines how energy is partitioned across frequencies and spatial modes.

5.3 Controlled Energy Transfer Between Modes

Recent experiments on coupled nonlinear resonators have demonstrated controlled energy transfer between modes with rational frequency ratios, such as 3:1 or 4:1.

When the system is tuned near a nonlinear resonance, energy injected into a high-frequency mode can be transferred almost entirely to a lower-frequency mode. Away from resonance, this transfer is strongly suppressed.

These results provide direct experimental evidence that nonlinear resonance enables deterministic redistribution of energy between modes without any violation of thermodynamic constraints.

6. Why the Question “Where Does the Energy Come From?” Is Ill-Posed

6.1 Limits of Linear Intuition

The persistence of the question “Where does the energy come from?” reflects the inappropriate application of linear intuition to nonlinear systems operating far from equilibrium.

In linear engineering models, energy enters as a scalar input, is transformed by a device, and exits as useful work or heat. Such models are effective within their domain of validity but fail to capture the behavior of systems dominated by resonance, field-mediated interactions, and nonlinear mode coupling.

In nonlinear open systems:

• energy can be stored in collective modes and fields;
• energy transfer depends on resonance conditions rather than linear pathways;
• dissipation may be spatially and temporally separated from energy input.

The absence of a simple linear model does not imply a violation of energy conservation. It indicates the need for a more complete description.

6.2 Hidden but Physical Energy Channels

Analyses that suggest energy imbalance typically neglect one or more of the following physically real channels:

• Field energy: electromagnetic fields store and transport energy;
• Collective modes: waves and coherent oscillations can carry large energy densities;
• Boundary-driven degrees of freedom: controlled boundaries can exchange energy nonlinearly;
• Amplitude-dependent dispersion: nonlinear dispersion alters resonance conditions.

When all relevant channels are included within the system boundaries, the energy balance closes.

7. Engineering Criteria of Validity for Nonlinear Systems

Scientific and engineering acceptance of nonlinear systems does not require complete intuitive understanding of all mechanisms. Historically, many complex phenomena were experimentally validated well before their theoretical descriptions were complete.

For nonlinear systems, robust engineering criteria include:

• reproducibility under controlled conditions;
• scalability across a class of systems;
• closed energy balance when all interactions are accounted for;
• non-decreasing total entropy for the isolated system;
• independent verification using multiple measurement methods.

8. Synthesis: From Categorical Error to Correct Formulation

The original question “Where does the energy come from?” implicitly assumes a closed, linear system. Under such assumptions, the question is meaningful.

In real nonlinear systems far from equilibrium, these assumptions do not hold:

• the system is open and exchanges energy with its environment through multiple channels;
• energy redistribution is governed by nonlinear resonance rather than linear flow;
• far-from-equilibrium conditions enable organized dissipative regimes.

A more appropriate question is therefore:

“How is the energy balance structured in an open nonlinear system, taking into account fields, environment, boundary conditions, and nonlinear dynamical regimes?”

This formulation is more demanding, but it admits answers fully consistent with established physical laws.

9. Conclusion

The first and second laws of thermodynamics remain foundational for both physics and engineering. They are not obstacles to nonlinear architectures; they serve as safeguards against incorrect analysis.

The central conclusions of this article are:

• system boundaries must be defined broadly enough to include all relevant interactions;
• open systems far from equilibrium fully comply with thermodynamic laws;
• energy cascades and resonant transfers are fundamental mechanisms in nature and technology;
• nonlinearity redistributes energy without creating or destroying it;
• experimental reproducibility and closed energy balance define physical validity.

Thermodynamics does not hinder innovation in nonlinear systems. It provides the framework within which such systems can be correctly understood. Apparent paradoxes arise not from violations of laws, but from the misuse of simplified models outside their domain of applicability.

References

1. Qian, H. (2006). Open-System Nonequilibrium Steady State: Statistical Thermodynamics, Fluctuations, and Chemical Oscillations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 110(31), 15063–15074. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp061858z
2. Prigogine, I. (1977). Structure, Dissipation and Life. Nobel Prize Lecture in Chemistry. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/prigogine-lecture.pdf
3. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Thermodynamics – Open Systems, Energy, Entropy. https://www.britannica.com/science/thermodynamics/Open-systems
4. de Wit, X. M., Fruchart, M., Khain, T., Toschi, F., & Vitelli, V. (2024). Pattern formation by turbulent cascades. Nature, 627, 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07074-z
5. Bhattacharjee, J. K. Turbulence Energy Spectrum. Indian Institute for Science Education and Research. https://www.icts.res.in/sites/default/files/seminar%20doc%20files/Jayanta%20K%20Bhattacharjee%2012-08-2020%20TPIMP.pdf
6. Shukurov, A. Introduction to Interstellar Turbulence. Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie. https://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/1295102/shukurov_i.pdf
7. Richard, L., et al. (2025). Electron Heating by Parallel Electric Fields in Magnetotail Reconnection. Physical Review Letters, 134, 215201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.215201
8. Dargent, J., et al. (2023). Energy Conversion by Magnetic Reconnection in Multiple Ion Species. Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL103324. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103324
9. Li, M., et al. (2020). Optoelectronic parametric oscillator. Nature Photonics, 14, 600–607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0631-7
10. Zhang, H., et al. (2025). Coherent energy transfer in coupled nonlinear resonators. Nature Communications, 16, 2242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59292-2
11. Vakakis, A. F., et al. (2018). Passive nonlinear targeted energy transfer and its applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376, 20170132. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0132
12. Wikipedia. Second Law of Thermodynamics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics
13. Wikipedia. Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belousov%E2%80%93Zhabotinsky_reaction
14. Wikipedia. Parametric oscillator. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parametric_oscillator

Scientific Scope & Limitations

The scope of this article is intentionally limited to the conceptual, theoretical, and experimentally supported analysis of energy transfer, redistribution, and conversion mechanisms in open nonlinear systems. The discussion focuses on well-established physical frameworks, including nonequilibrium thermodynamics, nonlinear dynamics, plasma physics, and classical electrodynamics, as documented in peer-reviewed literature.

This work does not attempt to provide a complete mathematical formalism for any specific device, nor does it address optimization, efficiency limits, control strategies, or long-term stability of particular implementations. Quantitative performance metrics, engineering tolerances, materials constraints, and system-level integration challenges are explicitly outside the scope of this publication.

The analysis is restricted to phenomena that are reproducible in principle and measurable within accepted experimental and metrological frameworks. Any extrapolation toward practical applications requires independent validation, controlled experimentation, and full energetic and entropic accounting within explicitly defined system boundaries.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for scientific, educational, and analytical purposes only. It presents a theoretical and experimental overview of energy transfer mechanisms in open nonlinear systems, based exclusively on publicly available, peer-reviewed scientific literature.

Nothing in this publication constitutes a claim of energy generation ex nihilo, a violation of the first or second laws of thermodynamics, or the existence of any undisclosed or hypothetical physical principles. All physical processes discussed herein are explicitly framed within established classical electrodynamics, statistical mechanics, plasma physics, nonlinear dynamics, and nonequilibrium thermodynamics.

Any references to energy amplification, transfer, accumulation, or redistribution should be understood strictly as mode coupling, resonance-mediated energy exchange, or field-mediated energy conversion within open systems operating far from equilibrium. Energy conservation and entropy balance are assumed to hold at all times when the system boundaries are correctly defined.

This article does not constitute an engineering specification, performance guarantee, investment solicitation, or product disclosure. Descriptions of physical mechanisms are illustrative and conceptual and do not imply technical readiness, commercial availability, or validated performance metrics.

The responsibility for interpreting, applying, or experimentally implementing any concepts discussed herein lies solely with the reader. No liability is assumed for any direct or indirect consequences arising from the use or misinterpretation of this material.