Operational Evidence.
Not a Promise.
VENDOR.Max is an Armstrong-type nonlinear electrodynamic oscillator operating in a controlled discharge-resonant regime, validated at TRL 5–6 under controlled laboratory conditions. The current evidence base includes 1,000+ cumulative operational hours, extended continuous cycles, and reproducible regime formation under sustained electrical load. At the complete device boundary: Pin,boundary = Pload + Plosses + dE/dt. Startup initiation and regime-level continuation must not be conflated with full-device boundary accounting. What remains to be independently verified is the energy transfer coefficient from the primary field to the secondary winding under extended real-load conditions: field strength stability, electrode degradation rate, and medium parameter sensitivity. Patent portfolio: WO2024209235 and ES2950176 (granted).
TRL 5–6: Internally Validated.
Independently Unverified.
Both Facts Matter.
VENDOR does not overstate its validation status. The technology has been validated at system level under controlled laboratory conditions — reproducibly, with calibrated instrumentation, across extended operational cycles. That is a meaningful engineering milestone. It is not certification. It is not field deployment. It is not independent verification. Those belong to subsequent stages, and the path is documented below.
Indicative timeline: approximately 3–5 years from current TRL 5–6 to initial commercial readiness, subject to validation outcomes, certification processes, and market conditions.
What Has Been Confirmed
at This Stage
Operational Record
1,000+ cumulative hours of laboratory operation across prototype configurations. Extended continuous cycles confirmed stable power delivery under constant load. All parameters monitored with calibrated instrumentation (±0.5% accuracy). Records timestamped. Environmental conditions logged throughout.
- Output voltage Within normal inverter regulation range
- Frequency Within grid-grade stability range
- Output power Stable under constant-power load mode
- Component state No failure-level degradation observed during the monitored internal test window
Physics Compliance
The operating principles underlying the VENDOR architecture are established phenomena — Townsend avalanche discharge, LC resonant circuits, nonlinear regime stabilization — implemented in a validated engineering configuration at system level.
- Repeatable regime formation under controlled conditions
- Stable nonlinear operating state under sustained electrical load
- Reproducible behaviour across multiple test configurations
- Consistent performance across temperature and load profiles
- Long-term field durability (requires TRL 7 pilots)
- Certified efficiency figures (requires formal accreditation)
- Manufacturing-grade repeatability (requires TRL 7–8)
- Energy transfer coefficient from primary field to secondary winding under extended real-load conditions (subject to independent boundary-level verification at TRL 6: field strength stability, electrode degradation rate, medium parameter sensitivity)
Intellectual Property
The core architecture is protected by an international patent portfolio covering the fundamental system design and engineering implementation.
-
GrantedES2950176Spain
-
PCTWO2024209235PCT family reference
-
PendingEP23921569.2EPC · 37 countries
-
PendingCN202380015725.5China
-
PendingIN202547010911India
-
PendingUSA PCT‑USUnited States
Patent protection was established before extended operational testing began. Architecture was legally documented and filed at the concept validation stage.
Full IP details and filing statusSafety Monitoring
During extended laboratory operation, proximity monitoring was conducted using calibrated handheld instruments.
These are internal spot measurements and do not constitute formal accredited safety certification, which is part of the CE/UL certification pathway at TRL 8.
Certification roadmap
Technology Is One Layer.
Three Dimensions Define
Engineering Readiness.
Deep-tech commercialization requires parallel maturity across technology, manufacturing, and intellectual property. VENDOR tracks all three independently, with explicit milestones at each stage of development.
Readiness
System validated in controlled laboratory environment. Nonlinear regime stable. Extended operational cycles confirmed. Reproducible prototype configuration.
Full-stack bench validation complete. CE/UL pre-dossier prepared. Independent boundary-level verification of three engineering parameters: field strength stability at C2.1–C2.3, electrode degradation rate, medium parameter sensitivity.
Formal CE + UL certification.
Pre-commercial deployment.
Readiness
Manufacturing proof-of-concept. DFM iterations in progress. BOM stability. Sub-assembly processes defined. Early EMS/OEM partner engagement.
Micro-power module pilot manufacturing capacity demonstrated. Process capability studies (Cpk > 1.33). Supplier qualification initiated.
OEM integration readiness across micro-power and infrastructure power ranges. 3+ Tier‑1/Tier‑2 EMS partners qualified. Manufacturing yield target: ≥94%.
Readiness
Granted national patent Spain ES2950176. PCT family reference WO2024209235. National phases active in EU, US, CN, IN. Freedom-to-operate review conducted — no blocking prior art identified to date.
Expansion of national phase coverage. Continuation filings. Manufacturing-side claim reinforcement.
Fully enforceable IP position across major markets and key manufacturing hubs, subject to jurisdictional procedures.
No Fuel Logistics.
No Battery Cycling.
No Moving Parts in the Core Architecture.
Zero mechanical wear pathways in the core system boundary. Target design service life exceeding 15 years, subject to validation at subsequent TRL stages.
No chemical fuels or combustion processes in the operating architecture. No supply chain dependency for core operation.
Core architecture designed without internal electrochemical storage in the operating core.
Architecture designed to avoid combustion-related fuels and battery-related hazard classes within the core system boundary, subject to final product configuration and applicable standards.
Multi-module design target: N+1 redundancy capable. Graceful degradation. No single point of operational failure in the intended architecture.
All features described as design targets validated at TRL 5–6 prototype scale. Long-term field durability requires validation at subsequent TRL stages.
What VENDOR Is Not.
At This Stage.
Current stage: TRL 5–6 internal laboratory validation. Formal certification (CE/UL/ISO) is aligned with TRL 8 and requires prototype maturity not yet achieved. Certification pathway is structured and under preparation.
System-level prototypes validated in laboratory conditions. Manufacturing-scale repeatability and field-environment durability belong to TRL 7–8 validation stages.
VENDOR operates under full boundary-level energy conservation. A startup impulse initiates the regime; regime-level continuation is maintained by internal electrodynamic processes. Boundary-level accounting remains mandatory: Pin,boundary = Pload + Plosses + dE/dt. Energy conservation at the device boundary applies without exception.
Designed for: off-grid, backup, distributed infrastructure, remote and uptime-critical applications. Not positioned for large-scale centralized (GW-class) power generation.
All validation to date is internal, under engineering protocols. The independent verification pathway includes intended engagement with accredited external bodies, subject to prototype readiness, scope acceptance, and institutional availability.
VENDOR is a physics-compliant architecture validated at prototype level. Indicative timeframe: approximately 3–5 years from current TRL to initial commercial readiness, subject to validation, certification, and market integration outcomes.
Core Questions.
Precise Answers.
TRL 5–6 means the system has been validated at system level under controlled laboratory conditions, with reproducible regime formation and 1,000+ cumulative operational hours. This confirms the architecture is stable and measurable — not that it is certified, commercially ready, or independently verified. Independent external verification is planned following completion of TRL 6 system readiness.
At the complete device boundary, the canonical answer is: external electrical input, fully accounted for under standard boundary-level energy balance rules. A startup impulse initiates the regime; subsequent regime-level continuation is described by the patented internal architecture and does not override device-boundary accounting. Pin,boundary = Pload + Plosses + dE/dt. Air and gas serve only as the interaction medium for the ionisation process. They are not an energy source. Energy conservation at the device boundary is not in question — it is the governing constraint of the architecture. What TRL 6 independently verifies is three engineering parameters under extended real-load conditions: field strength stability at C2.1–C2.3, discharge element degradation rate, and medium parameter sensitivity.
Yes. VENDOR operates as an open electrodynamic system within classical thermodynamics. A startup impulse initiates the operating regime, while complete boundary-level energy accounting remains applicable throughout operation. The operating principles — Townsend discharge, LC resonant circuits, nonlinear regime behavior — are well established in classical physics. The engineering contribution is in the system-level architecture and validated regime stabilization. The TRL 6 measurement step independently verifies the energy transfer coefficient from the primary field to the secondary winding under extended real-load conditions — specifically discharge element degradation rate, field strength stability, and medium parameter sensitivity. These are engineering parameters, not physics questions.
Yes. The three engineering parameters identified as verification targets have each been addressed at the engineering design level. Frequency drift under varying medium conditions — addressed architecturally through the multi-arrester parallel configuration described in patents ES2950176 and WO2024209235: overlapping but shifted frequency spectra across parallel arresters guarantee cumulative spectral density at the resonant frequency even when individual arrester spectra drift. Discharge element degradation and field strength stability under extended real-load conditions — engineering solutions have been developed and implemented in the current prototype configuration. These solutions are not disclosed publicly due to IP protection requirements, but are presented in full technical detail at investor meetings under NDA, including the reasoning behind why the boundary-level energy balance is expected to hold under extended real-load conditions. The ongoing independent laboratory validation is not a search for solutions to open problems. It is a formal measurement protocol designed to produce a publicly citable verification record — the final step before the architecture is presented to institutional partners and certification bodies.
Standard deep-tech IP protocol at TRL 5–6. Core patents have been filed internationally (WO2024209235, active across multiple jurisdictions) and system-level validation is ongoing. Additional patent filings are in progress. Expanded technical disclosure is aligned with certification milestones and qualified partner engagement under NDA. No implementation details sufficient for reproduction are disclosed at this stage.
Following TRL 6 prototype readiness, the independent verification pathway includes targeted engagement with accredited external bodies and laboratory partners. This is subject to prototype readiness, scope acceptance, and institutional availability. VENDOR does not represent guaranteed participation or specific outcomes at this stage. Timing is aligned with the TRL 6 to TRL 7 transition window.
An open system has defined boundaries through which energy can exchange with the environment. In VENDOR’s architecture, the system interacts with the surrounding medium through field conditions — not through consumption of the medium as a fuel. Validation is performed using an open-system measurement framework: all energy inputs and outputs are quantified at the defined device boundary under controlled conditions, consistent with classical electrodynamics and open-system thermodynamic principles.
Planned Verification · TRL 6
Planned: Boundary-Level
Energy Verification
The validation data presented on this page documents observed system behaviour under controlled laboratory conditions. It does not constitute a complete boundary-level energy balance verification. Energy conservation at the device boundary is not in question — it is the governing constraint of the architecture. What requires independent measurement is the energy transfer coefficient from the primary field to the secondary winding under extended real-load conditions.
A formal TRL 6 verification protocol has been defined, with independent instrumentation of energy flows across defined system nodes at the complete device boundary, targeting three specific engineering parameters:
Whether the primary field maintains sufficient amplitude across the secondary winding under extended continuous load, without regime collapse or drift.
Whether discharge element geometry and surface state remain within operational tolerances over the target service window, preserving discharge repeatability.
Whether regime stability is maintained across the operating envelope of humidity, pressure, and temperature variation expected in real deployment conditions.
Separation between internal recirculation (Pfb at C2.1–C2.3) and net energy delivered to load, with anti-self-deception checks at each instrumentation point.
Go Deeper
Into the Evidence
Full technical documentation of the extended endurance validation: black-box configuration, regime ignition procedure, load interface parameters, observed stability metrics, safety monitoring readings.
For: engineers, due diligence teams, technical evaluators.
View Endurance ProtocolComplete patent filing status across all active jurisdictions. Trademark protection. Disclosure strategy and NDA pathway.
For: IP attorneys, investors, OEM partners.
View Patent PortfolioThree-circuit discharge-resonant architecture: Primary Resonant Core · Secondary Feedback Path · Tertiary Load Path. Electromagnetic coupling only — no galvanic connections between circuits. Boundary definition and formal engineering classification of the operating mode.
Per patent ES2950176 / WO2024209235For: technical reviewers, academic partners, analytical evaluators.
View System Classification
Ready to Evaluate
the Architecture?
For Engineers and Technical Due Diligence
- Operational data. Patent documentation.
- Energy balance methodology. Validation pathway.
- NDA-protected technical Q&A.
For Investors and Strategic Partners
- EVCI structure. Market model.
- Design Partner pathway. Milestone triggers.
For Applications and Deployment Context
- Telecom · AI / Edge infrastructure
- Off-grid critical systems · Agriculture
- EV fleet