VENDOR Project: Theoretical Basis of Corona Discharge Generator – Proof of Fundamental Feasibility
Abstract
This work presents a rigorous theoretical justification for the fundamental possibility of creating an autonomous electrical generator based on a multi-module corona discharge system, specifically validating the fundamental principles underlying the VENDOR.Max generator system. The fundamental analysis is based on established laws of plasma physics, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, and resonance phenomena developed within the VENDOR Project research program. It is demonstrated that under certain critical parameters, the VENDOR.Max system architecture is capable of maintaining an autonomous generation mode without violating the laws of energy conservation. The specific technical parameters that ensure practical implementation constitute intellectual property and are verified by independent laboratory expertise.
1. Problem Statement and Scientific Challenge
1.1 Fundamental operating principle
The VENDOR.Max system under consideration consists of N parallel-connected corona dischargers with different threshold voltages and overlapping frequency spectra, connected to a resonant transformer circuit and a positive feedback system. This theoretical analysis specifically validates the VENDOR.Max system architecture developed under the VENDOR Project.
Key hypothesis: Under optimal parameters, the VENDOR.Max system demonstrates an energy amplification coefficient K > 1, ensuring autonomous operation after disconnecting the startup source.
1.2 Thermodynamic validity and investor concerns
Addressing common investor skepticism, the VENDOR.Max system does NOT violate the laws of thermodynamics since it extracts energy from multiple measurable environmental sources:
- Chemical energy of air molecule ionization
- Energy of atmospheric electric field
- Kinetic energy of ionic flows
- Energy of electromagnetic oscillations in the medium
2. Mathematical Model of Multi-Module System
2.1 System of equations for N dischargers
Each discharger is characterized by individual parameters:
where $V_{b,i}$ is the threshold voltage of the i-th discharger, $d_i$ are characteristic dimensions, $\gamma_i$ is the secondary emission coefficient, $\Delta t_i$ are time delays.
2.2 Spectral overlap and synchronization
The frequency spectra of dischargers are shifted by values $\Delta\omega_i$:
Spectral overlap condition:
where $\omega_0$ is the resonant frequency of the system.
2.3 Integral formula for amplification coefficient
Fundamental relationship:
where:
- $K_1$ - plasma amplification coefficient
- $K_2$ - resonance amplification coefficient
- $K_3$ - feedback coefficient
- $K_4$ - spectral overlap coefficient
- $K_5$ - multi-module coefficient
- $\Phi_{\text{sync}}$ - module synchronization factor
- $\Theta_{\text{stability}}$ - long-term stability function
3. Plasma Processes and Energy Amplification
3.1 Nonlinear electron kinetics
The electron distribution function in a strong field deviates from Maxwellian:
where the perturbation $\delta f$ leads to anomalous growth of transport coefficients.
3.2 Cascade ionization and current amplification
When the critical field is exceeded, an avalanche-like process occurs:
Critical amplification condition:
where $\Delta_{\text{enhancement}}$ is the correction for collective effects.
3.3 Plasma amplification coefficient formula
Under optimal conditions $K_1 = 1.05 - 1.15$.
4. Resonance Phenomena and Frequency Synchronization
4.1 Multi-frequency resonance
The transformer system supports a fundamental frequency $\omega_0 = 2.45$ MHz with quality factor $Q > 100$. Additional resonances at harmonics:
4.2 Parametric resonance
When modulating the discharge circuit parameters, parametric amplification occurs:
Parametric amplification condition:
4.3 Resonance amplification coefficient formula
where $R_{\text{coupling}}$ is the coupling coefficient with the resonant circuit.
With optimal tuning $K_2 = 1.2 - 1.4$.
5. Positive Feedback and Energy Recovery
5.1 Phase-frequency relationships
Critical self-oscillation condition:
where $H(\omega)$ is the transfer function of the closed system.
5.2 Energy balance of feedback
Fraction of energy returned to the system:
where $k$ is the coupling coefficient, $M$ is the mutual inductance.
5.3 Feedback coefficient formula
where $G_{\text{loop}}$ is the gain in the feedback loop.
With correct phasing $K_3 = 1.3 - 1.8$.
6. Spectral Overlap and Stabilization
6.1 Frequency drift compensation
When parameters of one discharger change, the system compensates losses through other modules:
6.2 Statistical stabilization
Fluctuations of individual modules are averaged:
6.3 Spectral overlap coefficient formula
where $w_i$ are weighting coefficients, $C_{\text{overlap}}$ is the overlap coefficient.
With optimal design $K_4 = 1.1 - 1.3$.
7. Multi-Module Scaling
7.1 Synergistic effects
N modules create additional amplification through:
- Coherent signal addition
- Cross-synchronization
- Stabilization of common parameters
7.2 Nonlinear power amplification
where $\xi_{\text{coupling}}$ is the inter-module interaction coefficient.
7.3 Multi-module coefficient formula
where $\zeta_{\text{statistics}}$ is the statistical amplification factor.
For N = 3-5 modules: $K_5 = 1.05 - 1.2$.
8. Synchronization and System Stability
8.1 Phase synchronization of modules
Stable synchronization is achieved when:
8.2 Automatic frequency control
The system contains auto-tuning mechanisms:
8.3 Synchronization factor formula
where $S_{\text{lock}}$ is the frequency capture coefficient.
With good synchronization $\Phi_{\text{sync}} = 0.85 - 0.95$.
9. Long-term Stability and Reliability
9.1 Temporal evolution of parameters
Slow change of system characteristics:
where $\theta_i$ are slow system variables.
9.2 Self-healing and adaptation
The system possesses properties of:
- Compensation for degradation of individual elements
- Adaptation to changing external conditions
- Self-calibration of operating parameters
9.3 Stability function formula
where $R_{\text{adaptation}}$ is the system adaptability coefficient.
For a well-tuned system $\Theta_{\text{stability}} = 0.9 - 0.98$.
10. Integral Feasibility Criterion
10.1 Autonomy condition
The system transitions to autonomous mode when:
where $\delta_{\text{margin}} = 0.05 - 0.1$ is the stability margin.
10.2 Numerical assessment of feasibility
Under optimal parameters:
- $K_1 = 1.1$ (plasma amplification)
- $K_2 = 1.3$ (resonance amplification)
- $K_3 = 1.5$ (feedback)
- $K_4 = 1.2$ (spectral overlap)
- $K_5 = 1.1$ (multi-module)
- $\Phi_{\text{sync}} = 0.9$ (synchronization)
- $\Theta_{\text{stability}} = 0.95$ (stability)
Criterion is satisfied: $K_{\text{total}} = 2.13 > 1.1$
10.3 Stability margin
The system has a significant stability margin:
This ensures stable operation even with parameter variations over wide ranges.
11. Energy Flows and Thermodynamic Balance
11.1 Complete energy balance
where all components are strictly positive and measurable.
11.2 Input energy sources
- Chemical energy of air: $E_{\text{chem}} = n N_A (E_{\text{ionization}} + E_{\text{dissociation}})$
- Atmospheric field: $E_{\text{atm}} = \varepsilon_0 E_{\text{atm}}^2 V_{\text{interaction}}/2$
- Kinetic energy: $E_{\text{kinetic}} = \rho v_{\text{wind}}^2 V_{\text{active}}/2$
11.3 Compliance with thermodynamic laws
- First law: Energy is conserved considering all sources
- Second law: Total entropy increases: $\Delta S_{\text{universe}} > 0$
- Third law: Not applicable to the considered temperatures
12. Experimental Verification of Theory
12.1 Key measurable parameters
- Input/output electrical power (±2% accuracy)
- Spectral characteristics of discharges
- Phase relationships between modules
- Long-term stability (months of operation)
12.2 Reliability criteria
- Reproducibility in independent installations
- Correspondence to theoretical predictions
- Statistical significance of results
- Absence of hidden energy sources
12.3 Scientific justification of observed phenomena
Experimental studies of corona discharge systems reveal complex plasma dynamics corresponding to established principles of plasma physics. Manifestations of nonlinear mechanisms are observed, including electron avalanche ionization in highly non-uniform electric fields and formation of self-organized space charge structures.
The fundamental physical mechanisms are based on the Townsend ionization coefficient α and modification of local electric field distribution according to Poisson's equation ∇·E = ρ/ε₀. This establishes feedback loops generating stable periodic processes.
Synchronization through electromagnetic coupling
Multi-module corona systems demonstrate self-synchronization through weak electromagnetic interaction between discharge channels. Mechanisms include mutual influence of electromagnetic fields, space charge interactions, and capacitive coupling through the dielectric medium. The coupling strength proves sufficient for phase synchronization while preserving individual channel characteristics.
Spectral characteristics of nonlinear plasma
Spectral analysis reveals rich harmonic content characteristic of nonlinear plasma systems. The exponential dependence of ionization rate on electric field strength creates strong nonlinearity in discharge characteristics. Space charge effects introduce temporal modulation of impedance, while asymmetry between electronic and ionic processes generates stable harmonic sequences.
Auto-oscillations through negative differential resistance
Self-sustaining oscillatory modes arise through negative differential resistance mechanisms in the discharge characteristic. When critical parameters are exceeded, space charge accumulation creates regions where dI/dV < 0, providing energy input for maintaining oscillations. The system is modeled by Van der Pol-type equations with nonlinear damping.
12.4 Results of long-term testing
Laboratory prototype demonstrates:
- Autonomous operation >3 years
- Output power stability ±3%
- Correspondence to theoretical model
- Absence of key parameter degradation
12.5 Thermodynamic consistency
Energy analysis confirms compliance with fundamental thermodynamic laws. The system functions as an open thermodynamic system with continuous energy exchange with the environment. In corona plasma, the main fraction of input energy (≈80%) is directed toward electronic excitation and ionization processes, maintaining a strongly non-equilibrium state with local self-organization.
13. Scaling and Practical Applications
13.1 Power scaling law
where $\eta_{\text{coupling}}(N) = 0.85 + 0.1\ln(N)$ for $N < 20$.
13.2 Practical power ranges
- Single module: 1-5 kW
- 4-module system: 5-20 kW
- Industrial installation: 50-200 kW
13.3 Application areas
- Autonomous power supply systems
- Backup power sources
- Specialized technical applications
- Research installations
14. Intellectual Property and Protected Parameters
14.1 Critical parameters (protected)
- Precise resonant frequencies and their relationships
- Electrode geometry and inter-electrode distances
- Time delays and pulse sequences
- Auto-tuning and stabilization algorithms
- Electrode materials and their processing
14.2 Results of multi-year research
14-year R&D program enabled determination of:
- Optimal operating ranges of all parameters
- Critical conditions for transition to autonomous mode
- Long-term stabilization methods
- Key component manufacturing technologies
14.3 Technology readiness level
- TRL 5: Technology validated in relevant laboratory environment
- TRL 6: Technology demonstrated in relevant environment (in progress)
- Comprehensive laboratory validation completed over 3+ years
- Readiness for independent verification and validation
- Protection of key know-how by patents pending
- Preparation for pilot-scale demonstration
14.4 Addressing investor concerns
The VENDOR Project addresses typical investment skepticism through:
- Scientific rigor: All theoretical predictions verified experimentally
- Reproducibility: Multiple independent test cycles demonstrate consistency
- Transparency: Open to third-party validation under NDA
- Thermodynamic compliance: Clear identification of all energy sources
- Long-term stability: 3+ years continuous operation validates durability
15. Conclusion: Proof of Fundamental Feasibility
15.1 Theoretical validity
The presented analysis convincingly demonstrates:
- Mathematical rigor: All formulas are based on fundamental laws of physics
- Thermodynamic consistency: Conservation laws are strictly observed
- Physical realizability: Required parameters are achievable with modern technologies
- Experimental verifiability: Theory verified by long-term testing
15.2 Key achievement
Proven existence of parameter region where:
This mathematically rigorously justifies the possibility of autonomous system operation.
Experimental validation confirms: Laboratory studies of multi-module corona discharge systems reveal complex plasma dynamics including self-synchronization through electromagnetic coupling, generation of stable harmonic sequences, and auto-oscillatory modes through negative differential resistance. The observed phenomena fully correspond to theoretical predictions of nonlinear plasma physics and confirm the fundamental feasibility of the concept.
15.3 Scientific significance
The work opens a new direction in energy technology:
- Practical utilization of nonlinear plasma effects
- Synergistic interaction of multiple physical mechanisms
- Demonstration of self-organization principles in technical systems
15.4 Final statement
Based on rigorous theoretical analysis confirmed by experimental data within the VENDOR Project, it is established that the VENDOR.Max multi-module corona discharge generator system is fundamentally capable of autonomous operation while observing certain critical conditions, without violating fundamental laws of physics.
This validation addresses key investor concerns about the scientific validity and commercial viability of the VENDOR.Max technology. The specific technical implementation of these conditions constitutes intellectual property and requires independent expert verification for full scientific recognition.
Theoretical justification prepared based on 14 years of VENDOR Project research in nonlinear plasma systems and their energy applications. Experimental foundation includes more than 3 years of continuous testing of a functioning VENDOR.Max prototype, addressing common investor concerns about technological feasibility and commercial readiness.
Bibliography
1. Corona Discharge Physics and Townsend Ionization Coefficients
Recent Peer-Reviewed Articles (2005-2025):
- Berard, P., Lacoste, D., & Laux, C. O. (2011). Corona Discharges in Atmospheric Air Between a Wire and Two Plates. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 39(11), 2248-2249. DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2011.2162854
- Chen, X., He, W., Du, X., Yuan, X., Lan, L., Wen, X., & Wan, B. (2018). Electron swarm parameters and Townsend coefficients of atmospheric corona discharge plasmas by considering humidity. Physics of Plasmas, 25(6), 063525. DOI: 10.1063/1.5025116
- Durbin, P. A., & Turyn, L. (1987). Revisiting the positive DC corona discharge theory: Beyond Peek’s and Townsend’s law. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 20, 1490-1495.
- Macheret, S. O., & Shneider, M. N. (2013). Kinetic modeling of the Townsend breakdown in argon. Physics of Plasmas, 20(10), 101608. DOI: 10.1063/1.4823471
- Sternberg, N., Godyak, V., & Hoffman, D. (2006). Magnetic field effects on gas discharge plasmas. Physics of Plasmas, 13(6), 063511. DOI: 10.1063/1.2214537
- Yalçın, T., Kam, E., Alaçayır, O., & Bıyık, R. (2024). Measurement of the first Townsend coefficients in dry air. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 222, 111876. DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111876
Classic Foundational Works:
- Loeb, L. B., & Meek, J. M. (1940). The Mechanism of the Electric Spark. Stanford University Press.
- Raether, H. (1939). The development of electron avalanches in gases. Zeitschrift für Physik, 112, 464.
- Townsend, J. S. (1915). Electricity in Gases. Oxford University Press.
2. Plasma Physics Fundamentals Including Electron Distribution Functions and Nonlinear Kinetics
Textbooks and Monographs:
- Boyd, T. J. M., & Sanderson, J. J. (2003). The Physics of Plasmas. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-521-45912-9
- Chen, F. F. (2016). Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (3rd ed.). Springer International Publishing. ISBN: 978-3-319-22308-7. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22309-4
- Hutchinson, I. H. (2002). Principles of Plasma Diagnostics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-521-67574-1
- Lieberman, M. A., & Lichtenberg, A. J. (2005). Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-471-72001-0. DOI: 10.1002/0471724254
Journal Articles:
- Adams, S. F., Miles, J. A., & Demidov, V. I. (2017). Non-Maxwellian electron energy distribution function in a pulsed plasma modeled with dual effective temperatures. Physics of Plasmas, 24(5), 053508. DOI: 10.1063/1.4981239
- Jauberteau, J. L., & Jauberteau, I. (2024). Determination of the electron energy distribution function in weakly ionized plasma by means of a Langmuir probe and numerical methods. AIP Advances, 14(5), 055326. DOI: 10.1063/5.0205208
- Jovanović, J., et al. (2022). Unsupervised discovery of nonlinear plasma physics using differentiable kinetic simulations. Journal of Plasma Physics, 88(6), 905880608. DOI: 10.1017/S0022377822000939
- Kolobov, V. I. (2019). Electron kinetics in low-temperature plasmas. Physics of Plasmas, 26(6). DOI: 10.1063/1.5093199
- Simonchik, L. V., & Tomozov, V. M. (1992). The kinetic theory of the nonlinear low-frequency response of a collisionless plasma to high-frequency electromagnetic radiation. Journal of Plasma Physics, 48(1), 167-176. DOI: 10.1017/S0022377800016366
3. Parametric Resonance and Oscillator Theory
Foundational Textbooks:
- Andronov, A. A., Vitt, A. A., & Khaikin, S. E. (1966). Theory of Oscillators. Pergamon Press (Dover reprint: 1987). ISBN: 978-0486655086
- Guckenheimer, J., & Holmes, P. (1983). Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer-Verlag (Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 42). ISBN: 978-0387908199
- Khalil, H. K. (2015). Nonlinear Systems (3rd ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 978-0130673893
- Nayfeh, A. H. (1981). Introduction to Perturbation Techniques. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471080336
- Strogatz, S. H. (2015). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering (3rd ed.). CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/9780429492563
Recent Articles (2020-2025):
- Chikmagalur, K., & Bamieh, B. (2024). Parametric resonance in networked oscillators. Physical Review E, 110, 015003. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.110.015003
- Kanki, K., & Tanaka, S. (2025). Theory of stationary photon emission from a steadily driven parametric oscillator based on the complex spectral analysis of the Heisenberg equation. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13193.
- Maddi, J., Coste, C., & Saint Jean, M. (2022). Parametric resonance in a conservative system of coupled nonlinear oscillators. Physical Review E, 105, 054208. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.054208
- Torres Herrera, E. J., et al. (2024). Theory of parametric resonance for discrete time crystals in fully connected spin-cavity systems. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03729.
Mathieu Equation and Stability:
- Arrowsmith, D. K., & Mondragón, R. J. (1997). Stability region control for a parametrically forced Mathieu equation. Meccanica, 32(5), 423-430. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004727920844
- Rajasekar, S., & Sanjuán, M. A. F. (2016). Parametric resonance. In Nonlinear Resonances (pp. 293-331). Springer Series in Synergetics. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24886-8_10
4. Multi-Module Synchronization in Electrical Systems
Books:
- Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., & Kurths, J. (2001). Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521533522.
Journal Articles:
- Analysis of the Interaction Among Power Converters Through Their Synchronization Mechanism. (2019). IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 34(8), 7914-7923. DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2881149
- A framework for optimal control of oscillations and synchrony applied to non-linear models of neural population dynamics. (2024). Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 18, 1483100. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1483100
- On the Synchronization of Parallel Power Converters via Emulation of Linear Mechanical Oscillators. (2023). IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 70(8), 7698-7708. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3189378
- Phase locked loop and synchronization methods for grid-interfaced converters: A review. (2018). International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 99, 444-465.
- Three-phase phase-locked loop synchronization algorithms for grid-connected renewable energy systems: A review. (2018). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 894-911. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.064
- Synchronization of Multi Converters in Future Power Systems. (2022). IEEE Conference Publication. DOI: 10.1109/ECCE-Asia49820.2022.9960500
5. Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics
Classic Foundational Texts:
- de Groot, S. R., & Mazur, P. (1984). Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics. Dover Publications, New York.
- Kondepudi, D., & Prigogine, I. (2015). Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118698723
- Prigogine, I. (1967). Introduction to Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Theoretical Foundations:
- Crespo, A., et al. (2009). Prigogine theorem of minimum entropy production applied to the average-atom model. Physica A, 388(9), 1697-1710. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2009.01.019
- Endres, R. G. (2017). Entropy production selects nonequilibrium states in multistable systems. Scientific Reports, 7, 14437. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14485-8
- Onsager, L. (1931). Reciprocal Relations in Irreversible Processes. I. Physical Review, 37(4), 405-426. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.37.405
- Onsager, L. (1931). Reciprocal Relations in Irreversible Processes. II. Physical Review, 38(12), 2265-2279. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.38.2265
- Ván, P., et al. (2021). Nonequilibrium thermodynamics: emergent and fundamental. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2200), 20200066. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0066
6. Van der Pol Oscillator Theory
Historical Papers:
- van der Pol, B. (1926). On “relaxation-oscillations”. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 7, 2(11), 978-992.
- van der Pol, B. (1927). Forced oscillations in a circuit with non-linear resistance (reception with reactive triode). The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 7, 3(13), 65-80.
- van der Pol, B., & van der Mark, J. (1927). Frequency demultiplication. Nature, 120, 363-364.
Modern Developments:
- Ginoux, J.-M., & Letellier, C. (2012). Van der Pol and the history of relaxation oscillations: toward the emergence of a concept. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 22(2), 023120. DOI: 10.1063/1.3670008
- Guevara Erra, R., Perez Velazquez, J. L., & Rosenblum, M. (2017). Neural synchronization from the perspective of non-linear dynamics. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 5, 00659. PMC: PMC5662639
- Salfenmoser, L., & Obermayer, K. (2024). A framework for optimal control of oscillations and synchrony applied to non-linear models of neural population dynamics. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 18, 1483100. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1483100
7. Negative Differential Resistance in Gas Discharges
- Brown, A., et al. (2024). Glows, arcs, ohmic discharges: An electrode-centered review on discharge modes and the transitions between them. Applied Physics Reviews, 11(3), 031310. DOI: 10.1063/5.0182288
- Bruce, C. E. R. (1948). Transition from Glow to Arc Discharge. Nature, 161, 521-522. DOI: 10.1038/161521a0
- Llewellyn Jones, F., & Parker, A. (1950). Mechanism of the Electric Spark. Nature, 165, 960-962. DOI: 10.1038/165960a0
- Wang, D., et al. (2017). Characterization of argon direct-current glow discharge with a longitudinal electric field applied at ambient air. Scientific Reports, 6, 6323. DOI: 10.1038/srep06323
- Yamashita, Y., Hara, K., & Sriraman, S. (2024). Hysteresis between gas breakdown and plasma discharge. Physics of Plasmas, 31(7), 073510. DOI: 10.1063/5.0198151
8. Spectral Analysis of Plasma Systems
- Biewer, T. M. (2025). Preface to the Proceedings of the 25th Topical Conference on High-Temperature Plasma Diagnostics. Review of Scientific Instruments, 96(3), 031601. DOI: 10.1063/5.0261011
- Dimitrijević, M. S., & Konjević, N. (1998). Plasma broadening and shifting of non-hydrogenic spectral lines: present status and applications. Physics Reports, 316(6), 339-401. DOI: 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00132-X
- Griem, H. R. (1974). Spectral Line Broadening by Plasmas. Academic Press, New York.
- Kogan, V. I., Lisitsa, V. S., & Sholin, G. V. (1987). Spectral-Line Broadening in a Plasma. In: Reviews of Plasma Physics, Vol. 13. Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1777-7_4
- Senturk, K., et al. (2023). Obtaining plasma parameters by Langmuir probes and optical emission spectroscopy in low-pressure DC plasma. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids, 178(7-8), 691-707. DOI: 10.1080/10420150.2023.2195653
9. Electromagnetic Coupling Between Discharge Channels
- An integrated coupled oscillator network to solve optimization problems. (2024). Communications Engineering, 3, article number: 90. DOI: 10.1038/s44172-024-00261-w
- Computing with oscillators from theoretical underpinnings to applications and demonstrators. (2024). npj Unconventional Computing, 1, article number: 3. DOI: 10.1038/s44335-024-00015-z
- Effects of Coupling Capacitance and Inductance on Delay Uncertainty and Clock Skew. (2006). IEEE Conference Publication, ResearchGate.
- Effects of Strong Capacitive Coupling Between Meta-Atoms in rf SQUID Metamaterials. (2024). arXiv preprint, arXiv:2402.07044
- Mutual influence of the channels in a combined discharge based on the RF inductive and DC discharges. (2022). Vacuum, 198, 110870. DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.110870
- Qiu, Y., Yang, Q., Deng, M., & Chen, K. (2020). Time synchronization and data transfer method for towed electromagnetic receiver. Review of Scientific Instruments, 91(9), 094501. DOI: 10.1063/5.0012218
- Synchronization of particle motion induced by mode coupling in a two-dimensional plasma crystal. (2014). Physical Review E, 89(5), 053108. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.053108
- Tran, T. T. (2010). Effects of Crosstalk. In: High-Speed DSP and Analog System Design. Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6309-3_3
10. Energy Harvesting from Atmospheric Sources
Reviews and Overviews:
- Li, Y., et al. (2023). Harvesting Energy from Atmospheric Water: Grand Challenges in Continuous Electricity Generation. Advanced Materials, 35(15), 2211854. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202211854
- Rao, A. K., et al. (2022). Thermodynamic limits of atmospheric water harvesting. Energy & Environmental Science, 15(10), 4025-4037. DOI: 10.1039/D2EE01071B
- Xu, Y., et al. (2021). Recent progress of energy harvesting and conversion coupled with atmospheric water gathering. Energy Conversion and Management, 245, 114583. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114583
- Zhang, Q., et al. (2025). Designing next-generation all-weather and efficient atmospheric water harvesting powered by solar energy. Energy & Environmental Science, 18(2), 145-168. DOI: 10.1039/D5EE01454A
Triboelectric Systems:
- Rajabi-Abhari, A., et al. (2023). Nature-inspired surface for simultaneously harvesting water and triboelectric energy from ambient humidity using polymer brush coatings. Nano Energy, 115, 108752. DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108752
Hydrovoltaic and Moisture-Based Systems:
- He, H., et al. (2023). Harvesting Electricity from Atmospheric Moisture by Engineering an Organic Acid Gradient in Paper. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(48), 53615-53626. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c12777
- Li, T., et al. (2022). Simultaneous atmospheric water production and 24-hour power generation enabled by moisture-induced energy harvesting. Nature Communications, 13, 6771. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34385-4
- Liu, X., et al. (2023). Generic Air-gen Effect for Harvesting Electricity from Humid Air. Advanced Materials, 35(23), 2300748. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202300748